Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation Algorithm–Moral Consensus or Pragmatic Compromise?

The Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation Algorithm–Moral Consensus or Pragmatic Compromise? Abstract The selection and balancing of values for the Eurotransplant kidney allocation algorithm poses both practical and ethical challenges. The paper argues that any allocation algorithm can only be justified by reference to some substantive conception of a good life that reflects our value preferences regarding the allocation of scarce donor kidneys. It is concluded that the criterion of HLA compatibility maximizes overall rather than individual utility. The paper emphasizes that good pragmatic arguments for maintaining the primacy of HLA matching can never replace a more systematic, independent ethical justification. As neither the selection nor the balancing of the different allocation criteria are based on an explicit ethical justification, the paper concludes that the choice of the Wujciak-algorithm was rather a product of pragmatic compromise than moral consensus. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Analyse & Kritik de Gruyter

The Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation Algorithm–Moral Consensus or Pragmatic Compromise?

Analyse & Kritik , Volume 23 (2) – Nov 1, 2001

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/the-eurotransplant-kidney-allocation-algorithm-moral-consensus-or-G2sR3qze1l

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the
ISSN
0171-5860
eISSN
2365-9858
DOI
10.1515/auk-2001-0209
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The selection and balancing of values for the Eurotransplant kidney allocation algorithm poses both practical and ethical challenges. The paper argues that any allocation algorithm can only be justified by reference to some substantive conception of a good life that reflects our value preferences regarding the allocation of scarce donor kidneys. It is concluded that the criterion of HLA compatibility maximizes overall rather than individual utility. The paper emphasizes that good pragmatic arguments for maintaining the primacy of HLA matching can never replace a more systematic, independent ethical justification. As neither the selection nor the balancing of the different allocation criteria are based on an explicit ethical justification, the paper concludes that the choice of the Wujciak-algorithm was rather a product of pragmatic compromise than moral consensus.

Journal

Analyse & Kritikde Gruyter

Published: Nov 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.