Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Emergence of Intentional Meaning: A Different Twist on Pragmatic Linguistic Action

The Emergence of Intentional Meaning: A Different Twist on Pragmatic Linguistic Action Abstract Recovering what speakers intend to communicate is widely recognized as the fundamental goal of linguistic understanding. Most scholars within linguistic pragmatics assume that intentions are private mental acts that operate prior to the performance of linguistic actions, and that listeners, once again, must somehow infer people’s inner intentions to understand what they mean in context. This article outlines some of the experimental evidence suggesting that intentions are critical in communication. However, my main goal is to suggest that intentional meaning is not necessarily a prior mental act that occurs before people speak, nor is the recovery of a person’s so-called intentions the main goal of linguistic interaction. I describe a self-organizational approach that explains how linguistic utterances may be enacted in an intentional way without there being underlying intentions driving these actions. This perspective offers a vision of pragmatic linguistic action that encompasses the totality of people’s behaviors when coordinating with others. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Lodz Papers in Pragmatics de Gruyter

The Emergence of Intentional Meaning: A Different Twist on Pragmatic Linguistic Action

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/the-emergence-of-intentional-meaning-a-different-twist-on-pragmatic-jRrC2kod3B
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the
ISSN
1895-6106
eISSN
1898-4436
DOI
10.1515/lpp-2012-0003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Recovering what speakers intend to communicate is widely recognized as the fundamental goal of linguistic understanding. Most scholars within linguistic pragmatics assume that intentions are private mental acts that operate prior to the performance of linguistic actions, and that listeners, once again, must somehow infer people’s inner intentions to understand what they mean in context. This article outlines some of the experimental evidence suggesting that intentions are critical in communication. However, my main goal is to suggest that intentional meaning is not necessarily a prior mental act that occurs before people speak, nor is the recovery of a person’s so-called intentions the main goal of linguistic interaction. I describe a self-organizational approach that explains how linguistic utterances may be enacted in an intentional way without there being underlying intentions driving these actions. This perspective offers a vision of pragmatic linguistic action that encompasses the totality of people’s behaviors when coordinating with others.

Journal

Lodz Papers in Pragmaticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.