Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
IVARSSON (2002)
221Journal Economic Geography, 2
GREGERSEN (1997)
479Regional studies, 31
FIGUEIREDO (2003)
Learning capability accumu - lation and firms differences : Evidence from latecomer steel In Industrial and CorporateChange, 12
COHEN (1989)
569Journal, 99
COHEN (1990)
128Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
LANE (1998)
461Journal, 19
BLOMSTRÖM (2001)
435Journal Technology Management, 22
LANE (1998)
Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning In Strategic ManagementJournal, 19
KIM (1999)
Building technological capability for industrialization : Analytical frameworks and Korea s experience In Industrial and CorporateChange, 8
BLOMSTRÖM (2001)
Foreign direct in - vestment and spillovers of technology In International ofJournal Technology Management, 22
MOWERY (1995)
Inward technology transfer and competitiveness : the role of national inno - vation systems InCambridge Journal of Economics, 19
COHEN (1989)
Innovation and learning : The two faces of In The Econom - icJournal, 99
BOON (2002)
1445Research Policy, 31
LALL (1992)
165World Development, 20
KOGUT (1992)
383Organization Science, 3
KIM (1999)
111Change, 8
FIGUEIREDO (2002)
685Technovation, 22
COOKE (1997)
475Research policy, 26
MOWERY (1995)
67Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19
BERGER (2006)
Do firms require an efficient innovation system to develop innovative technological capabilities ? Empirical evidence from Singapore Malaysia and Thailand In International ofJournal Technology Management, 36
ARROW (1962)
155Review Economic Studies, 29
FIGUEIREDO (2003)
607Change, 12
BERGER (2006)
267Journal Technology Management, 36
Technological absorptive capacity of local and foreign firms in Southeast Asia. Examples from Singapore, Penang and Bangkok. The article reflects on the conceptualization of absorptive capacity (AC) and distinguishes between potential and realized AC. Next it analyses potential AC in an exploratory manner for a) all surveyed and b) only R&D-performing local and foreign firms. Using general indicators such as qualification of the workforce and training expenditure as well as R&D-specific indicators such as R&D-expenditure, -personnel and -cooperation, it finds evidence that in general foreign firms tend to possess a higher absorptive capacity while the opposite is true for R&D performing firms.
Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie – de Gruyter
Published: Oct 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.