Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Tax Enforcement Procedure Under Section 104 of Personal Income Tax Act: Matters Arisings

Tax Enforcement Procedure Under Section 104 of Personal Income Tax Act: Matters Arisings AbstractThe refusal of a taxpayer to respond or pay the tax due has always provoked the tax authority to approach the court with an ex-parte application in chambers. The result of this ex parte application arms the tax authority with a restraining order. With a detached team of policemen, the tax authority will storm the premises of the taxpayer, vandalize, forcefully drive out the tax payer and seal up the premises. All these arrangements and decisions are done behind the taxpayer. This paper examined the constitutionality of the entire procedure for the recovery of tax due to the tax payer. The paper utilized doctrinal methodology in analyzing the extant laws and case laws as they relate to the subject matter. The paper submits that decisions under section 104 PITA are too weighty to be taken in the absence of the taxpayer. The paper, therefore, recommends some sort of judicial activism by judicial officers in exercising their discretion and accommodate the interest of the taxpayer. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Legal Studies de Gruyter

Tax Enforcement Procedure Under Section 104 of Personal Income Tax Act: Matters Arisings

Journal of Legal Studies , Volume 26 (40): 17 – Dec 1, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/tax-enforcement-procedure-under-section-104-of-personal-income-tax-act-Q6U7AKQE5e
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2020 Kachi Bielu John, published by Sciendo
eISSN
2392-7054
DOI
10.2478/jles-2020-0018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe refusal of a taxpayer to respond or pay the tax due has always provoked the tax authority to approach the court with an ex-parte application in chambers. The result of this ex parte application arms the tax authority with a restraining order. With a detached team of policemen, the tax authority will storm the premises of the taxpayer, vandalize, forcefully drive out the tax payer and seal up the premises. All these arrangements and decisions are done behind the taxpayer. This paper examined the constitutionality of the entire procedure for the recovery of tax due to the tax payer. The paper utilized doctrinal methodology in analyzing the extant laws and case laws as they relate to the subject matter. The paper submits that decisions under section 104 PITA are too weighty to be taken in the absence of the taxpayer. The paper, therefore, recommends some sort of judicial activism by judicial officers in exercising their discretion and accommodate the interest of the taxpayer.

Journal

Journal of Legal Studiesde Gruyter

Published: Dec 1, 2020

Keywords: Enforcement; Tax; Distrain; Demand; Assessment; Ex-Parte

There are no references for this article.