Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Dietrich (2014)
Consent as the Foundation of Political Authority – A Lockean PerspectiveRationality, Markets and Morals, 5
R. Forst (2000)
Toleranz : philosophische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Praxis einer umstrittenen Tugend
R. Hare, G. Meggle (1983)
Freiheit und Vernunft
T. Christiano (2011)
An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to DemocracyPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 39
Giorgio Agamben (2012)
Demokratie? : eine Debatte
G. Gaus (2010)
The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World
Christiano (2011)
An Instrumental Argument for a Human Right to Democracy in Sezession und Demokratie Berlin Consent as the Foundation of Political Authority A Lockean Perspective in Soll ich ? StuttgartPublic Affairs RMM, 5
Benhabib (1995)
Ein deliberatives Modell demokratischer Legitimität in The Limits of Liberty Between Anarchy and Leviathan Chicago Political Legitimacy and Democracy in ed Recht auf Menschenrechte FrankfurtDZPh Ethics
(2011)
Ein deliberatives Modell demokratischer Legitimität, in: DZPh
Kolodny (2014)
Rule over none II Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy in The Sources of Normativity CambridgePhilosophy Public Affairs
AbstractWe need to acknowledge that the members of most modern societes adhere to different and partially contradictory moral convictions which to overcome we yet don’t have the intellectual means. Since such convictions typically include opions about which moral rules should be established as laws there will be disagreement about the correct rules of law as well. The article investigates the possibilities to find a system of laws that all can accept on the basis of such moral pluralism. It develops six steps and models for the required justification. As the final step has the form of a strategic negotiation the concluding section explores which forms of representation and which deviations from unanimity are acceptable within this procedural model of justification.
Analyse & Kritik – de Gruyter
Published: Nov 1, 2017
Keywords: Law; justification of law; contractualism; proceduralism; compromise; negotiation; moral pluralism; principle of unanimity; representation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.