Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2002)
Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measure ment Issues
Hardin (1968)
The Tragedy of the Commons in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lim ate Change he y sical Science asis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change CambridgeScience
(1984)
The E vo lu tion o f C ooperation
E. Fehr, H. Gintis (2007)
Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical
G. Hardin (1968)
Tragedy of the CommonsScience, 162
(1982)
Determinants of Individual Environmental Behav iour: An Outline of a Behavioural Model and Some Research Findings, in: The N etherlands Jo urn a l o f Sociology
Axel Franzen (1995)
Group Size and One-Shot Collective ActionRationality and Society, 7
C. Böhringer (2010)
1990 bis 2010: Eine Bestandsaufnahme von zwei Jahrzehnten europäischer Klimapolitik, 11
Tilo Beckers, K. Birkelbach, Jörg Hagenah, Ulrich Rosar (2010)
Komparative empirische Sozialforschung
A. Diekmann, Peter Preisendörfer (1992)
Persónliches umweltverhalten: Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit.Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44
(1995)
D er Schw eizer U m weltsurvey 199)
Robb Willer (2009)
Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action ProblemAmerican Sociological Review, 74
Abstract In this contribution we take a look at the development of environmental concern and mobility behavior of the population in Germany and Switzerland. The proportion of survey participants who express concern about the state of the natural environment is high in both countries. However, this proportion did not increase during the last two decades despite the ongoing public debate about environmental issues. At the same time the demand for private transportation did increase in Germany by almost 20% (in Switzerland by 2.5%). However, fuel consumption per capita decreased in Germany by 6.5% and in Switzerland by 2.2%. Our time series analyses of these trends suggest that this reduction is due to the price increase of gasoline which was substantial in both countries and not due to any change in attitudes. We argue that further price increases are appropriate means to reduce fuel consumption. However, our analyses also show that the price elasticity for fuel is low.
Analyse & Kritik – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.