Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abstract The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) forced the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Board to make a decision on modifying their existing high-risk pool program or establishing a new one to meet the requirements of the federal law. The Board’s deliberation minutes provide the data for this study to explore decision making from the combined theories of garbage cans and and joint fact-finding. The Board was confronted with a choice opportunity containing a number of problems, potential solutions, and actors. Their deliberation approach was a collaborative process guided by technical analysts. The paper uses this scenario to investigate associations between decision actors and decision themes derived from the literature, with the aid of correlation and correspondence analyses. Significant associations involving analysts, board members and interest group representatives are found. Implications for decision-making and further studies are described at the conclusion.
California Journal of Politics and Policy – de Gruyter
Published: Oct 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.