Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Seats at the Table: Actors and Decision Variables in Implementing the Affordable Care Act in California

Seats at the Table: Actors and Decision Variables in Implementing the Affordable Care Act in... Abstract The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) forced the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Board to make a decision on modifying their existing high-risk pool program or establishing a new one to meet the requirements of the federal law. The Board’s deliberation minutes provide the data for this study to explore decision making from the combined theories of garbage cans and and joint fact-finding. The Board was confronted with a choice opportunity containing a number of problems, potential solutions, and actors. Their deliberation approach was a collaborative process guided by technical analysts. The paper uses this scenario to investigate associations between decision actors and decision themes derived from the literature, with the aid of correlation and correspondence analyses. Significant associations involving analysts, board members and interest group representatives are found. Implications for decision-making and further studies are described at the conclusion. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png California Journal of Politics and Policy de Gruyter

Seats at the Table: Actors and Decision Variables in Implementing the Affordable Care Act in California

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/seats-at-the-table-actors-and-decision-variables-in-implementing-the-ukPpbdnMo3
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the
ISSN
2194-6132
eISSN
1944-4370
DOI
10.1515/cjpp-2013-0014
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) forced the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Board to make a decision on modifying their existing high-risk pool program or establishing a new one to meet the requirements of the federal law. The Board’s deliberation minutes provide the data for this study to explore decision making from the combined theories of garbage cans and and joint fact-finding. The Board was confronted with a choice opportunity containing a number of problems, potential solutions, and actors. Their deliberation approach was a collaborative process guided by technical analysts. The paper uses this scenario to investigate associations between decision actors and decision themes derived from the literature, with the aid of correlation and correspondence analyses. Significant associations involving analysts, board members and interest group representatives are found. Implications for decision-making and further studies are described at the conclusion.

Journal

California Journal of Politics and Policyde Gruyter

Published: Oct 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.