Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Kónig (2008)
Moderne öffentliche Verwaltung : Studium der Verwaltungswissenschaft
Flear (2014)
Elisabeta Dano and Florin Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig Unpublished Court Reports Governing Public : EU Law Regulation and Biopolitics Publishing Europarecht VerlagHealth
Mark Flear (2015)
Governing Public Health: EU Law, Regulation and Biopolitics
Neringa Daukšienė (2005)
Laisvas darbuotojų judėjimas ir valstybės tarnybos išimtis, 72
(2013)
ECR, C-140/12
(2006)
Employment Law, New York: Oxford University
(2005)
Europos Bendrijos bendrosios rinkos teisė
(2010)
Europarecht 6, München
Abstract The free movement of persons is one of the most successful European Union projects, serving as a majorly important factor promoting the European integration processes. The adoption of the Treaty on the European Union and the creation of EU citizenship implemented significant changes: the status of EU citizens and their right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States can no longer be interpreted in the way it was before the adoption of the Treaty on the European Union. There are no requirements for EU citizens within the Treaty to pursue professional or independent activities or to work under an employment contract in order to access provided rights. However, the right of free movement is not unlimited. The administrations of the Member State governments are authorized to impose restictions on the free movement of citizens. In the light of these facts, this article examines exceptions in the field of free movement of persons and indentifies concepts of public policy, public security and public health. Special attention is given to so-called rule limitation of restrictions and to the mechanism of protection against expulsion from the country. The article concludes by saying that the institutions of Member State governments have the right to evaluate threats within the territory of the country and to decide on the content of public security by themselves. However, their discretion can not be used as an instrument to treat the conduct of other Member State citizens in a worse way than that of their own local citizens.
Baltic Journal of European Studies – de Gruyter
Published: Feb 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.