Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kenneth Abbott, D. Snidal (2000)
Hard and Soft Law in International GovernanceInternational Organization, 54
Xilo (2009)
informatica come vettore di innovazione organizzativa della giustizia : il caso del Processo Civile in
B. Watkin (1977)
Rule of law.Nursing mirror and midwives journal, 144 18
(1998)
The Rights Revolution: Lawyers
Vauchez (2012)
superior della magistraturaIl Il
Session (2014)
OECD Fostering Inclusive Growth and Trust in Justice Institutions Access Performance notes meeting NovemberAlternatives, 12
(2014)
“ L ’ innovazione e la ricerca di risorse . ” In
(2009)
L’informatica come vettore di innovazione organizzativa della giustizia: il caso
Palombella (2010)
The Rule of Law as an Institutional Ideal InRule of Law and Democracy : Inquiries into Internal and External Issues edited by Leonardo Leiden
(2010)
Evaluation of European Judicial Systems. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing
(2003)
Giustizia e politica: I nodi della Seconda Repubblica
A. Sweet (1999)
Judicialization and the Construction of GovernanceComparative Political Studies, 32
(2014)
L’innovazione e la ricerca di risorse.
F. Marco, P. Langbroek (2000)
The challenge of change for judicial systems : developing a public administration perspective
Peter Miller (2008)
Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices MatterSocial Research, 68
Paris
OECD Background ottobre Equal Access to JusticeNotes Round Table
(2010)
Judicial Accountabilities in New Europe. Farnham: Ashgate
M. Delmas-Marty (2005)
Les juges dans la mondialisation : la nouvelle révolution du droitCritique Internationale, 28
Stone (2002)
the of edited by UniversityConstruction Governance Law Politics
Guarnieri (2016)
sistema politico italianoIl Il
Abstract Introduction: Is soft power effective? Justice institutions have become a key topic in the international scientific and institutional agendas some decades ago, for different, and still interdependent reasons: the waves of democratizations (Pridham 2000), the increasing power of the judicial branch (Russell and O Brian 2001; Stone Sweet 2002), the transnationalisation of the processes of law making and law enforcement (Allard and Garapon 2005), the increasing demand for justice, dispute resolution, and rights enforcement (Epp 1998; OECD 2014, 2015). Despite the vast literature focusing on these phenomena, very little has been said on the impact that the recent development of the quality of justice mainstream ( Fabri et al. 2005 ; Piana 2010 ) has on the relationship between the judicial and the executive branch. Notoriously, this relationship is one of the key dimensions for a constitutional democracy.
Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.