Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Quality of Justice as an Institutional Game. Insights from the Italian Case

Quality of Justice as an Institutional Game. Insights from the Italian Case Abstract Introduction: Is soft power effective? Justice institutions have become a key topic in the international scientific and institutional agendas some decades ago, for different, and still interdependent reasons: the waves of democratizations (Pridham 2000), the increasing power of the judicial branch (Russell and O Brian 2001; Stone Sweet 2002), the transnationalisation of the processes of law making and law enforcement (Allard and Garapon 2005), the increasing demand for justice, dispute resolution, and rights enforcement (Epp 1998; OECD 2014, 2015). Despite the vast literature focusing on these phenomena, very little has been said on the impact that the recent development of the quality of justice mainstream ( Fabri et al. 2005 ; Piana 2010 ) has on the relationship between the judicial and the executive branch. Notoriously, this relationship is one of the key dimensions for a constitutional democracy. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines de Gruyter

Quality of Justice as an Institutional Game. Insights from the Italian Case

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/quality-of-justice-as-an-institutional-game-insights-from-the-italian-Xq92Q3Pf7T

References (20)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the
ISSN
2194-5799
eISSN
2153-1552
DOI
10.1515/jeeh-2016-0002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Is soft power effective? Justice institutions have become a key topic in the international scientific and institutional agendas some decades ago, for different, and still interdependent reasons: the waves of democratizations (Pridham 2000), the increasing power of the judicial branch (Russell and O Brian 2001; Stone Sweet 2002), the transnationalisation of the processes of law making and law enforcement (Allard and Garapon 2005), the increasing demand for justice, dispute resolution, and rights enforcement (Epp 1998; OECD 2014, 2015). Despite the vast literature focusing on these phenomena, very little has been said on the impact that the recent development of the quality of justice mainstream ( Fabri et al. 2005 ; Piana 2010 ) has on the relationship between the judicial and the executive branch. Notoriously, this relationship is one of the key dimensions for a constitutional democracy.

Journal

Journal des Économistes et des Études Humainesde Gruyter

Published: Dec 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.