Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/de-gruyter/performance-measures-and-its-pitfalls-an-exploratory-study-pmIESZIFNh
- Publisher
- de Gruyter
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2014 by the
- ISSN
- 2194-6132
- eISSN
- 1944-4370
- DOI
- 10.1515/cjpp-2013-0003
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Abstract Outcome-based management is not new in the public sector, having been developed by US states and cities over the past three decades. Publicizing the outcome of governmental programs on specific priority indicators has the proven potential to enhance external accountability and improve the overall performance of public agencies. Reporting performance measures become the presentational strategy of pundits who believe that “what gets measured is what gets valued.” Some of the questions raised in this study are: do the performance measures used for management of public organizations reflect only the external concerns of federal and state officials or do they evaluate the internal concerns of the organization as well? Are the external stakeholders dictating the performance indicators thereby creating intergovernmental ties or design of performance measures, an organic extension of organizational management efforts? This study examines the different policy types, values, models, and internal/external concerns implemented by a large municipal government agency in the US and what the indicators represent in a collaborative network of actors. The findings suggest that type of initiation method reflects the type of indicators that are being used for measuring performance of public organizations.
Journal
California Journal of Politics and Policy – de Gruyter
Published: Oct 1, 2014