Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jeffrey Rouder, R. Ratcliff (2004)
Comparing categorization models.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 133 1
R. Port, J. Dalby (1982)
Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in EnglishPerception & Psychophysics, 32
Sandeep Phatak, J. Allen (2007)
Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121 4
Riya Singh, J. Allen (2012)
The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131 4
K. Stevens, D. Klatt (1974)
Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55 3
J. Mller (1978)
Interactions in processing segmental and suprasegmental features of speech.Perception & psychophysics, 24 2
N. Silbert, Robin Thomas (2012)
Decisional separability, model identification, and statistical inference in the general recognition theory frameworkPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20
J. Allen (2005)
Consonant recognition and the articulation index.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117 4 Pt 1
G. Miller, P. Nicely (1955)
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English ConsonantsJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27
A. Cutler, Andrea Weber, R. Smits, Nicole Cooper (2004)
Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116 6
D. Norris, J. McQueen, A. Cutler (2000)
Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessaryBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 23
N. Silbert (2012)
Syllable structure and integration of voicing and manner of articulation information in labial consonant identification.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131 5
J. Kingston, R. Diehl (2015)
Phonetic KnowledgeLanguage, 70
W. Batchelder, C. Crowther (1997)
Multinomial processing tree models of factorial categorizationJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 41
J. Sawusch, D. Pisoni (1974)
On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants.Journal of phonetics, 2 3
D. Green, J. Swets (1966)
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Tyler Perrachione, Jiyeon Lee, Louisa Ha, P. Wong (2011)
Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130 1
T. Nearey (1995)
Speech perception as pattern recognition.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101 6
T. Nearey (1990)
The segment as a unit of speech perception
D. Massaro, G. Oden (1980)
Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67 3
N. Silbert, J. Townsend, J. Lentz (2009)
Independence and separability in the perception of complex nonspeech soundsAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71
(1981)
Dependency relations during the processing of speech
(2000)
Acoustic phonetics (Vol
R. Smits (2001)
Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 27 5
J. Kingston, R. Diehl, Cecilia Kirk, Wendy Castleman (2008)
On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrastJournal of phonetics, 36 1
S. Sturtz, U. Ligges, A. Gelman (2005)
R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from RJournal of Statistical Software, 12
J. Ohala (2005)
PHONETIC EXPLANATIONS FOR SOUND PATTERNS: IMPLICATIONS FOR GRAMMARS OF COMPETENCE., 1
J. Flege (2006)
Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems
Eric Oglesbee (2008)
Multidimensional stop categorization in English, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, and Canadian French
(1989)
Stochastic general recognition theory
P. Eimas, V. Tartter, Joanne Miller, N. Keuthen (1978)
Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic featuresPerception & Psychophysics, 23
Tanya Kraljic, A. Samuel (2006)
Generalization in perceptual learning for speechPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13
R. Kessinger, S. Blumstein (1997)
Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and EnglishJournal of Phonetics, 25
J. Kingston, N. Macmillan (1995)
Integrality of nasalization and F1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection‐theoretic application of the Garner paradigmJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97
David Lunn, Andrew Thomas, N. Best, D. Spiegelhalter (2000)
WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibilityStatistics and Computing, 10
B. McMurray, A. Jongman (2011)
What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.Psychological review, 118 2
F. Ashby, James Townsend (1986)
Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological review, 93 2
J. Kingston, N. Macmillan, Laura Dickey, R. Thorburn, C. Bartels (1997)
Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101 3
A. Agresti (1992)
A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency TablesStatistical Science, 7
Alvin Liberman, Pierre Delattre, Franklin Cooper (1957)
Some Cues for the Distinction Between Voiced and Voiceless Stops in Initial PositionLanguage and Speech, 1
R. Smits (2001)
Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysisPerception & Psychophysics, 63
Todd Bailey, U. Hahn (2005)
Phoneme similarity and confusabilityJournal of Memory and Language, 52
H. Kadlec, C. Hicks (1998)
Invariance of perceptual spaces and perceptual separability of stimulus dimensions.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 24 1
N. Macmillan, J. Kingston, R. Thorburn, Laura Dickey, C. Bartels (1999)
Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 5
L. Volaitis, Joanne Miller (1992)
Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92 2 Pt 1
James McClelland, J. Elman (1986)
The TRACE model of speech perceptionCognitive Psychology, 18
José Benkí (2003)
Analysis of English Nonsense Syllable Recognition in NoisePhonetica, 60
Robin Thomas (2001)
Perceptual interactions of facial dimensions in speeded classification and identificationPerception & Psychophysics, 63
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
R. Nosofsky (1986)
Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 115 1
G. Oden, D. Massaro (1978)
Integration of featural information in speech perception.Psychological review, 85 3
C. Best, M. Tyler, O. Bohn, M. Munro (2007)
Nonnative and second-language speech perception : commonalities and complementarities
R. Fisher (2010)
On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P
L. Olzak, T. Wickens (1997)
Discrimination of Complex Patterns: Orientation Information is Integrated across Spatial Scale; Spatial-Frequency and Contrast Information are NotPerception, 26
K. Jong, N. Silbert, Kirsten Regier, Aaron Albin (2011)
Statistical relationships in distinctive feature models and acoustic‐phonetic properties of English consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129
A. Lahiri, Henning Reetz (2010)
Distinctive features: Phonological underspecification in representation and processingJ. Phonetics, 38
C. Best, G. McRoberts, E. Goodell (2001)
Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109 2
T. Nearey (1992)
Context Effects in a Double-Weak Theory of Speech PerceptionLanguage and Speech, 35
Gregory Ashby, Nancy Perrin (1988)
Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and RecognitionPsychological Review, 95
José Benkí (2001)
Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in EnglishJ. Phonetics, 29
Abstract Distinctive features define a multidimensional structure that must be implemented in speech production and perception. A multilevel Gaussian General Recognition Theory model is presented as a model of multidimensional feature perception. The model is fit to data from three experiments probing identification of noise-masked, naturally-produced labial and alveolar English stop consonants (p), (b), (t), and (d) in onset (syllable-initial) and coda (syllable-final) position. The results indicate systematic perceptual deviations from simple place and voicing structure in individual subjects and at the group level. Comparing onset and coda positions shows that syllable position modulates the deviation patterns, and comparing speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble indicates that deviations from simple feature structure are reasonably robust to variation in noise characteristics. Possible causes of the observed perceptual confusion patterns are discussed, and extensions of this work to studies of feature structure in speech production and investigation of non-native speech perception are briefly outlined.
Laboratory Phonology – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.