Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Iène Gijbels, J. Mielniczuk (1990)
Estimating the density of a copula functionCommunications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 19
J. Dißmann, E. Brechmann, C. Czado, D. Kurowicka (2012)
Selecting and estimating regular vine copulae and application to financial returnsComput. Stat. Data Anal., 59
Wahba (1990)
Models for Observational Data PhiladelphiaSIAM
T. Nagler (2015)
Kernel Smoothing for Bivariate Copula Densities
Lorentz (1953)
ofToronto Toronto, 24
P. Embrechts, J. Nešlehová (2007)
Dependence modeling with copulasThe Business & Management Collection
Songxi Chen, P. Hall (1993)
Smoothed empirical likelihood confidence intervals for quantilesAnnals of Statistics, 21
Spanhel
Simplified vine copula models : Approximations based on the simplifying assumption Available at https arxiv org abs
A. Chiang (2007)
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With RTechnometrics, 49
Brechmann (2013)
Modeling dependence with vine copulas The packageStat Softw, 52
H. Joe (1998)
Multivariate models and dependence conceptsBiometrics, 54
C. Genest, K. Ghoudi, L. Rivest (1995)
A semiparametric estimation procedure of dependence parameters in multivariate families of distributionsBiometrika, 82
Ingrid Haff, J. Segers (2012)
Nonparametric estimation of pair-copula constructions with the empirical pair-copulaComput. Stat. Data Anal., 84
Aiichiro Nakano (2005)
Stochastic Simulation
Stöber (2012)
and Sampling pair copula constructions with applications to mathematical finance In - Mai and Simulating Copulas Models Sampling Algorithms Applications World Scientific Publishing SingaporeStochastic
Ruppert (2003)
Semiparametric Regression University, 31
Scheffer (2017)
Smooth nonparametric vine copulas QuantFinance, 17
T. Bedford, R. Cooke (2001)
Probability Density Decomposition for Conditionally Dependent Random Variables Modeled by VinesAnnals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32
G. Pan (1999)
Local Regression and LikelihoodTechnometrics, 42
G. Kauermann, Christian Schellhase (2014)
Flexible pair-copula estimation in D-vines using bivariate penalized splinesStatistics and Computing, 24
M. Wand (2001)
Local Regression and LikelihoodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 96
Hobæk
Haff Nonparametric estimation of pair - copula constructions with the empirical pair - copula Comput Statist DataAnal, 16
C. Boor (1978)
A Practical Guide to Splines
T. Nagler (2016)
kdecopula: An R Package for the Kernel Estimation of Copula DensitiesarXiv: Computation
T. Nagler (2016)
kdecopula: An R Package for the Kernel Estimation of Bivariate Copula DensitiesarXiv: Computation
K. Aas, C. Czado, A. Frigessi, Henrik Bakken (2009)
Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependenceInsurance Mathematics & Economics, 44
C. Czado (2010)
Pair-Copula Constructions of Multivariate Copulas
H. Joe (1996)
Families of $m$-variate distributions with given margins and $m(m-1)/2$ bivariate dependence parameters
Nagler (2017)
kdecopula An Package for the Kernel Estimation of Bivariate Copula Densities Available at https arxiv org abs, 27
Christian Schellhase, Fabian Spanhel (2016)
Estimating non-simplified vine copulas using penalized splinesStatistics and Computing, 28
M. Fischer, C. Koeck, S. Schlüter, F. Weigert (2009)
An empirical analysis of multivariate copula modelsQuantitative Finance, 9
Czado (2009)
Aas copula constructions of multiple dependence InsuranceMath, 44
C. Czado, S. Jeske, Mathias Hofmann (2013)
Selection strategies for regular vine copulae, 154
M. Sklar (1959)
Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges, 8
Fischer (2009)
Weigert An empirical analysis of multivariate copula models QuantFinance, 12
(2016)
VineCopula: Statistical Inference of Vine Copulas
T. Nagler, C. Czado (2015)
Evading the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric density estimation with simplified vine copulasJ. Multivar. Anal., 151
Simon Wood (2006)
Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R
P. Eilers, B. Marx (1996)
Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penaltiesStatistical Science, 11
D. Kurowicka, H. Joe (2010)
Dependence Modeling: Vine Copula Handbook
Brechmann (2012)
Aas Truncated regular vines in high dimensions with application to financial data Statist, 40
Arthur Charpentier, J. Fermanian, O. Scaillet (2007)
The estimation of copulas : theory and practice
Morales (2011)
Counting vines In Dependence Modeling Copula Handbook pp World Scientific Publishing Singapore, 25
Loader (1999)
Local Regression Likelihood Verlag New York, 23
Rose
Modeling and Estimating Multivariate Dependence Structures with the Bernstein Copula Ph thesis Maximilians, 30
Schepsmeier (2017)
Statistical Inference of Copulas package version Available on, 2
P. Janssen, J. Swanepoel, N. Veraverbeke (2014)
A note on the asymptotic behavior of the Bernstein estimator of the copula densityJ. Multivar. Anal., 124
T. Bedford, R. Cooke (2002)
Vines: A new graphical model for dependent random variablesAnnals of Statistics, 30
Bernard Silverman (1987)
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(2011)
Counting vines
Weingessel (2013)
quadprog Functions to solve Quadratic Programming Problems package version Available on
G. Kauermann, Christian Schellhase (2014)
Flexible Pair-Copula Estimation in D-vines with Penalized SplinesStatistics and Computing, 24
G. Geenens, Arthur Charpentier, D. Paindaveine (2014)
Probit Transformation for Nonparametric Kernel Estimation of the Copula DensityBernoulli, 23
G. Wahba (1990)
Spline Models for Observational Data
Fabian Spanhel, Malte Kurz (2015)
Simplified vine copula models: Approximations based on the simplifying assumptionElectronic Journal of Statistics
(2012)
Sampling pair copula constructions with applications to mathematical nance
Gunky Kim, M. Silvapulle, P. Silvapulle (2007)
Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulasComput. Stat. Data Anal., 51
Gijbels (1990)
Estimating the density of a copula function TheoryStatist Methods, 15
Charpentier (2006)
The estimation of copulas Theory and practice In Copulas From Theory to Application in Finance pp Risk Books London
D. Ruppert, M. Wand, R. Carroll (2003)
Semiparametric Regression: Author Index
O. Nápoles, R. Cooke, D. Kurowicka (2010)
About the number of vines and regular vines on n nodes
C. Hurvich, J. Simonoff, Chih-Ling Tsai (1998)
Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterionJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 60
Doro Rose (2015)
Modeling and estimating multivariate dependence structures with the Bernstein copula
E. Brechmann, U. Schepsmeier (2013)
Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: The R Package CDVineJournal of Statistical Software, 52
M. Scheffer, Gregor Weiß (2012)
Smooth nonparametric Bernstein vine copulasQuantitative Finance, 17
Alessio Sancetta, S. Satchell (2004)
THE BERNSTEIN COPULA AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO MODELING AND APPROXIMATIONS OF MULTIVARIATE DISTRIBUTIONSEconometric Theory, 20
Joe (1996)
Families of variate distributions with given margins and bivariate dependence parameters In Distributions with Fixed Marginals and Related Topics CAInst Math Statist, 19
Ripley (1987)
StochasticSimulation, 29
(2013)
quadprog: Functions to solve Quadratic Programming Problems
T. Nagler (2014)
Kernel Methods for Vine Copula Estimation
Songxi Chen (1999)
Beta kernel estimators for density functionsComputational Statistics & Data Analysis, 31
E. Brechmann, C. Czado, K. Aas (2012)
Truncated regular vines in high dimensions with application to financial dataCanadian Journal of Statistics, 40
AbstractIn the last decade, simplified vine copula models have been an active area of research. They build a high dimensional probability density from the product of marginals densities and bivariate copula densities. Besides parametric models, several approaches to nonparametric estimation of vine copulas have been proposed. In this article, we extend these approaches and compare them in an extensive simulation study and a real data application. We identify several factors driving the relative performance of the estimators. The most important one is the strength of dependence. No method was found to be uniformly better than all others. Overall, the kernel estimators performed best, but do worse than penalized B-spline estimators when there is weak dependence and no tail dependence.
Dependence Modeling – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 26, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.