Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
AbstractThe Pandectist Jurisprudence and its Historical Background. This prolonged critique will observe carefully an undoutedly important and timely enterprise initiated by H.-P. Haferkamp and T. Repgen to understand the Pandectist legal thinking immanently which has been often blocked for its rather pejorative reputation such as too conceptual, too systematic, too abstract and lifeless etc. It will be shown that this significant first step must be surely continued – only with far more attentiveness. Especially one must read the overall complex structure of the Pandectist legal thinking almost with a seismographic sensitiveness and simultaneously with due respect to the general and long-term historical background.
Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 26, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.