Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Moritz Goldsteins ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹: Politische Kampfschrift und unpolitisches Bekenntnis

Moritz Goldsteins ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹: Politische Kampfschrift und unpolitisches Bekenntnis Abstract: The ›Kunstwart‹-debate of 1912 – which was provoked by the almost unknown Moritz Goldstein ’s essay ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹,– is usually regarded as one of the most important debates of the pre-war years. Goldstein saw himself misinterpreted, however, because he had not intended to write a political text but a private confession, a description of the unsolvable problem of being grown up within the German culture and the decision to support the growing up of a Jewish culture. Goldstein demanded a Jewish literature but acknowledged at the same time that a German writer was unable to achieve this. His self-assessment never has been taken seriously. In this paper the attempt is made to read Goldstein ’s essay as a political statement but likewise as a literary confession. He was as much enthralled by Zionism as by the culture of Wilhelm II’s Germany and its ideal of honour. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Aschkenas de Gruyter

Moritz Goldsteins ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹: Politische Kampfschrift und unpolitisches Bekenntnis

Aschkenas , Volume 24 (1) – Sep 1, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/moritz-goldsteins-deutsch-j-discher-parna-politische-kampfschrift-und-50dJA6SmCN

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the
ISSN
1016-4987
eISSN
1865-9438
DOI
10.1515/asch-2014-0018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: The ›Kunstwart‹-debate of 1912 – which was provoked by the almost unknown Moritz Goldstein ’s essay ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹,– is usually regarded as one of the most important debates of the pre-war years. Goldstein saw himself misinterpreted, however, because he had not intended to write a political text but a private confession, a description of the unsolvable problem of being grown up within the German culture and the decision to support the growing up of a Jewish culture. Goldstein demanded a Jewish literature but acknowledged at the same time that a German writer was unable to achieve this. His self-assessment never has been taken seriously. In this paper the attempt is made to read Goldstein ’s essay as a political statement but likewise as a literary confession. He was as much enthralled by Zionism as by the culture of Wilhelm II’s Germany and its ideal of honour.

Journal

Aschkenasde Gruyter

Published: Sep 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.