Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract: The ›Kunstwart‹-debate of 1912 – which was provoked by the almost unknown Moritz Goldstein ’s essay ›Deutsch-jüdischer Parnaß‹,– is usually regarded as one of the most important debates of the pre-war years. Goldstein saw himself misinterpreted, however, because he had not intended to write a political text but a private confession, a description of the unsolvable problem of being grown up within the German culture and the decision to support the growing up of a Jewish culture. Goldstein demanded a Jewish literature but acknowledged at the same time that a German writer was unable to achieve this. His self-assessment never has been taken seriously. In this paper the attempt is made to read Goldstein ’s essay as a political statement but likewise as a literary confession. He was as much enthralled by Zionism as by the culture of Wilhelm II’s Germany and its ideal of honour.
Aschkenas – de Gruyter
Published: Sep 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.