Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Georges Kleiber (2006)
Sémiotique de l'interjectionLangages, 40
H. Clark, J. Tree (2002)
Using uh and um in spontaneous speakingCognition, 84
T. Wharton (2003)
Interjections, language, and the ‘showing/saying’ continuumPragmatics & Cognition, 11
T. Wharton (2003)
Natural Pragmatics and Natural CodesMind & Language, 18
(2001)
Rethinking well
D. Blakemore (2002)
Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers
C. Buridant (2006)
L'interjection : jeux et enjeuxLangages, 40
Deirdre Wilson, R. Carston (2007)
A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts.
Natalia Vallverdú, M. Bobo (2003)
La interjección : semántica y pragmática
K. Aijmer (2004)
Interjections in a contrastive perspective
Rosa Montes (1999)
The development of discourse markers in Spanish: InterjectionsJournal of Pragmatics, 31
Deirdre Wilson (1998)
Linguistic structure and inferential communication
Deirdre Wilson, D. Sperber (1993)
Linguistic form and relevance
Ascensión Soriano (1999)
L'interjection dans la BD : réflexions sur sa traductionMeta: Translators' Journal, 44
F. Ameka (1992)
The meaning of phatic and conative interjectionsJournal of Pragmatics, 18
A. Wierzbicka (1992)
The semantics of interjectionJournal of Pragmatics, 18
R. Carston (2002)
Thoughts and Utterances
V. Žegarac (1998)
What is “Phatic Communication”?Pragmatics and beyond. New series, 58
L. Rosier (2000)
Interjection, subjectivité, expressivité et discours rapporté à l’écrit : petits effets d’un petit discours, 34
Deirdre Wilson, T. Wharton (2006)
Relevance and prosodyJournal of Pragmatics, 38
(1990)
Relevance relations in discourse: Index
V. Escandell-Vidal (1998)
Intonation and procedural encoding : The case of Spanish interrogativesPragmatics and beyond. New series, 58
R. Carston (2002)
Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning - more questions than answers.
(1998)
Goleman, Daniel
A. Vassileva (1994)
Vers un traitement modal de l'interjection: traduction de la modalité injonctive par les interjections en français, 23
B. Fraser (2009)
An Account of Discourse MarkersInternational Review of Pragmatics, 1
(1987)
The instability of graded structure in concepts
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
A. Damasio (1994)
Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books
D. Sperber, D. Wilson (1998)
The mapping between the mental and the public Lexicon
T. Fretheim (1998)
Intonation and the Procedural Encoding of Attributed Thoughts
Alcaide Lara , Esperanza . “ La interjección ” . In La expresión de la modalidad en el habla de Sevilla , edited by Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez and Esperanza Alcaide Lara
B. Fraser (2006)
On the Conceptual-Procedural DistinctionStyle, 40
Katharina Meng, Susanne Schrabback (1999)
Interjections in adult-child discourse: The cases of German HM and NAJournal of Pragmatics, 31
F. Ameka (1992)
Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speechJournal of Pragmatics, 18
R. Carston (1997)
Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistisc
R. Itani (1998)
A relevance-based analysis of hearsay particles: With special reference to Japanese sentence-final particlette
D. Sperber, Deirdre Wilson (2008)
A deflationary account of metaphors
B. Endres-Niggemeyer, Kai Haseloh, J. Müller, Simone Peist, Irene Sigel, Alexander Sigel, Elisabeth Wansorra, Jan Wheeler, Brünja Wollny (1998)
Communication and Cognition
C. Crangle, P. Suppes, R. Hipkiss (2002)
Cross-cultural Pragmatics : The Semantics of Human Interaction
(2002)
Prosody and the interaction
Sidney Greenbaum, E. Weiner (2000)
The Oxford reference grammar
R. Carston (2011)
Relevance Theory 2. Relevance Theory – Principles and Processes 2.1 Relevance Theory and Cognition for Detailed Exemplification of the Rt-based Account of Lexical Adjustment, Resulting in 3. Relevance Theory and Issues in Philosophy of Language 3.1 Reference and Definite Descriptions
K. Fischer, M. Drescher (1996)
Methods for the description of discourse particles: contrastive analysisLanguage Sciences, 18
S. Spence (1995)
Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human BrainBMJ, 310
(2006)
Interjections”. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by K. Brown, 743-746
M. Świątkowska (2006)
L'interjection : entre deixis et anaphoreLangages, 40
Paul Meyer, R. Blass (1992)
DiscourseLanguage in Society, 21
Siobhan Chapman (2005)
Logic and Conversation
R. Carston (2002)
Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication
S. Nicolle, B. Clark (1998)
Phatic interpretations: standarisation and conventionalisation
(2002)
Ideolectic characterisation in A Doll’s House”. Scandinavia
David Wilkins (1992)
Interjections as deicticsJournal of Pragmatics, 18
D. Brockway (1981)
Semantic constraints on relevance
A. Vassileva (2007)
Sur le traitement de la forme du signifié interjectionnelLangages, 165
Geert Jacobs (1995)
Anna Wierzbicka. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human InteractionFunctions of Language, 2
D. Sperber (2005)
Modularity and Relevance
M. Cruz (2005)
Relevance Theory and Historical Linguistics: Towards a Pragmatic Approach to the Morphological Changes in the Preterite from Old English to Middle English
(1990)
How so/such/what/how exclamatories mean
R. Quirk, G. Leech, Jan Svartvik (1988)
A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language
C. Bolly, Liesbeth Degand (2009)
Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers: From conceptual to procedural meaning
(2003)
Diachronic change and procedural meaning
M. Cruz (2009)
Towards an Alternative Relevance-Theoretic Approach to InterjectionsInternational Review of Pragmatics, 1
Might Interjections Encode Concepts? More Questions than Answers This paper reflects on the conceptual nature of interjections. Although there are convincing reasons to claim that interjections do not encode concepts, arguments can be adduced to question such claim. In fact, some pragmatists have contended that they may be conceptual elements. After reviewing both the non-conceptualist and conceptualist approaches to interjections, this paper discusses some reasons that can be given to reconsider the conceptuality of interjections. Nevertheless, it adopts an intermediate standpoint by arguing that the heterogeneity of interjections, with items incorporated from other lexical categories, and the openness of the word class they constitute, which results in the coinage of certain interjections or the innovative usage of some elements, could indicate the existence of a continuum of more and less conceptual items. In any case, this paper suggests that those items with conceptual content would not encode full concepts, but some schematic material requiring subsequent pragmatic adjustments.
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.