Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Sargent (1999)
The Conquest of American Inflation
Olena Kostyshyna (2012)
APPLICATION OF AN ADAPTIVE STEP-SIZE ALGORITHM IN MODELS OF HYPERINFLATIONMacroeconomic Dynamics, 16
B. Bernanke, I. Mihov (1998)
The Liquidity Effect and Long-Run NeutralityNBER Working Paper Series
B. Bernanke, I. Mihov (1995)
Measuring Monetary PolicyMonetary Economics
Chang‐Jin Kim, C. Nelson (1999)
Has the U.S. Economy Become More Stable? A Bayesian Approach Based on a Markov-Switching Model of the Business CycleReview of Economics and Statistics, 81
A. Marcet, J. Nicolini (2003)
Recurrent Hyperinflations and LearningMacroeconomics eJournal
Margaret McConnell, Gabriel Pérez-Quirós (1998)
Output Fluctuations in the United States: What Has Changed Since the Early 1980s?
Tao Zha (2005)
WERE THERE REGIME SWITCHES IN US MONETARY POLICY?
(1997)
“ America ’ s Peacetime Inflation : The 1970 s . ” edited by C . Romer , D . Romer , Reducing Inflation
Timothy Cogley, T. Sargent (2003)
Drifts and Volatilities: Monetary Policies and Outcomes in the Post WWII U.S.ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)
G. Evans, S. Honkapohja (2001)
Learning and expectations in macroeconomics
C. Sims (1980)
Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles: Monetarism ReconsideredEconomic History
B. Mccallum (1999)
Role of the Minimal State Variable Criterion in Rational Expectations ModelsInternational Tax and Public Finance, 6
A. Marcet, T. Sargent (1989)
Convergence of Least-Squares Learning in Environments with Hidden State Variables and Private InformationJournal of Political Economy, 97
J. Beran (2003)
Time series analysis
J. Stock, M. Watson (1998)
Median unbiased estimation of coefficient variance in a time-varying parameter modelJournal of the American Statistical Association, 93
(2002)
The Evolution of Economic Understanding and Postwar Stabilization Policy
Fabio Milani (2014)
Learning and time-varying macroeconomic volatilityJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 47
P. Kumar (1985)
Theory and practice of recursive identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30
Abstract The paper presents an alternative real time adaptive learning algorithm in the presence of signal-to-noise ratio uncertainty. The main innovation of this algorithm is that it uses a gain which is determined within the model: it continuously depends on the extent of misevaluation of parameters embedded in the forecast error. We show that in the presence of signal-to-noise ratio misevaluation, the usage of the proposed learning algorithm is a significant improvement on the Kalman Filter learning algorithm. In a full information case, the Kalman Filter learning algorithm is still the optimal tool.
Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics – de Gruyter
Published: Feb 14, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.