Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2018)
Confronting Dystopia
D. Acemoglu, P. Restrepo (2018)
The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and EmploymentAmerican Economic Review
S. Ferlander (2007)
The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for HealthActa Sociologica, 50
J. Galende (2006)
Analysis of Technological Innovation from Business Economics and ManagementTechnovation, 26
Daron Acemoglu, P. Restrepo (2020)
AI and Jobs: Evidence from Online VacanciesPSN: Technology (Topic)
(2002)
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HUMAN CAPITAL AND ECONOMIC GROWTH
R. Putnam (1993)
Making Democracy Work
Daron Acemoglu, Francisco Gallego, Francisco Gallego, James Robinson (2014)
Institutions, Human Capital and DevelopmentPSN: Comparative Political Institutions & Development (Topic)
Francisco Molina-Castillo, J. Munuera-Alemán (2009)
New product performance indicators: Time horizon and importance attributed by managers ☆Technovation, 29
Soumyananda Dinda (2007)
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital and Economic Growth: A Productive Consumption ApproachMacroeconomics: Consumption
Richard DeMartino (2006)
Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms, Journal of Product
AbstractThe current labour market is at a crossroads: on one hand, there are challenges triggered by technological pressures and perks, aiming at a greener, more sustainable and resilient economic growth, and on the other hand, there are the changes and tensions generated by the current institutional frameworks, that show delays in mitigating the apparent “de-socialising” of this market. The pandemic paradox of 2019-2021 has emphasized several vulnerabilities particularly of economic-institutional nature. Traditional theories seem unsatisfactory while unorthodox approaches are faced with hesitancy. The present paper intends to present a brief analysis of labour market’s challenges in the immediate future by proposing a mixed approach combining traditional statistical-data with a less employed institutional framework. The approach is substantiated and constructed by the structural and cognitive features that the new labour market would require. It suggests a possible way for considering the aims of the Green Deal, the vulnerabilities highlighted by the pandemic and by the recent conflict in the immediate proximity of the EU-27. All these developments bring about changes for several socio-economic categories, rendering most of them vulnerable. The split between “essential” and “non-essential” economic activities, platform work and the gig economy hint to increased relevance of the three types of intangible capital: human, social and intellectual. This will require an integrating perspective, if severe economic and social effects are to be avoided in the immediate future. The model we propose aims to show how, by taking account of the human, social and intellectual capital, better policies can be developed as regards labour market efficiency and efficacy.
Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: Labour market; “de-socialising”; Intangible capital; Socio-economic categories; Economic policies; J08; J24; J68
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.