Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Adkins (1962)
Heidegger and LanguagePhilosophy, 37
(2010)
Nussbaum , Frontiers of Justice , 117 , 128 ; Anderson , “ Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice , ” 92 - 93 ; Linda Barclay , “ Disability , Respect and Justice
Nagel (2005)
The Problem of Global Justice in and Public AffairsPhilosophy, 33
A. Abizadeh (2007)
Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive JusticePhilosophy & Public Affairs, 35
(1973)
Arrow , “ Some Ordinalist - Utilitarian Notes on Rawls ’ s Theory of Justice
Ronzoni (2009)
The Global Order : A Case of Background Injustice ? A Practice - Dependent Account in and Public AffairsPhilosophy, 37
Miller (2005)
Against Global Egalitarianism in The of ` Ideal Theory as Ideology inJournal Ethics Hypatia, 9
J. Skemp (1959)
Plato's Phaedo . Translated with Introduction and Commentary by R. Hackforth. (Cambridge University Press. 1955. Pp. vii & 200. Price 21s.)Philosophy, 34
Nozick (1974)
Anarchy State and Utopia New York Frontiers of Justice Oxford Contractualism Reciprocity and Egalitarian Justice in Left - Libertarianism Rawlsian Not Luck Egalitarian in of Politi - calPolitics Philosophy Economics Journal Philosophy, 6
Cohen (1995)
Self - Ownership Freedom and Equality Cambridge A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled in Essays in URL http : / commons pacificu edu eip vol iss Justice in Ideal Theory : A Refutation inPhilosophy Political Studies, 9
Thomas Pogge (2002)
Can the Capability Approach Be JustifiedPhilosophical Topics, 30
A. Sen (1980)
Equality of What?Seven Deadly Economic Sins
Kittay (1997)
Human Dependency and Rawlsian Equality in ed Feminists Rethink the Self Boulder CO Contemporary Political Philosophy : An Introduction Oxford Hume and Rawls on the Circumstances and Priority of Justice in ofHistory Political Thought, 26
Barry (1989)
Theories of Justice Berkeley John Rawls and the Search for Stability in a Justice as Impartiality Oxford Reciprocity London Distributive Justice State Coercion and Autonomy in and Public AffairsEthics Philosophy, 105
Abizadeh (2008)
Cooperation Pervasive Impact and Coercion : On the Scope ( Not Site of Distributive Justice in and Public AffairsPhilosophy, 35
L. Barclay (2010)
Disability, Respect and JusticeJournal of Applied Philosophy, 27
A. Lister (2005)
Hume and Rawls on the circumstances and priority of justiceHistory of Political Thought, 26
Gaus (2010)
The Order of Public Reason : A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World Cambridge Constructing Justice in and Public AffairsPhilosophy, 20
Julius (2006)
Nagel s Atlas in and Public AffairsPhilosophy, 34
Fehr (2002)
Strong Reciprocity Human Cooperation and the Enforcement of Social Norms in Human Congruence and the Good of Justice in ed The Cambridge Companion to Rawls Cambridge Book Review of Justice in LawNature Frontiers Texas Review, 13
S. Meckled-Garcia (2008)
On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: Constructivism and international agencyJournal of Political Philosophy, 16
“ Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice , ” 83 . See p . 88 for Anderson ' s discussion of the political nature of her capabilities approach . 25
Cynthia Stark (2007)
How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of JusticeJournal of Political Philosophy, 15
Abstract This paper tries to reconcile reciprocity with a fundamentally ‘subject- Centred’ ethic by interpreting the reciprocity condition as a consequence of the fact that justice is in part a relational value. Duties of egalitarian distributive justice are not grounded on the duty to reciprocate benefits already received, but limited by a reasonable assurance of compliance on the part of those able to reciprocate, because their point is to constitute a valuable relationship, one of mutual recognition as equals. We have unconditional duty to help establish just global institutions, institutions which would allow us to share fairly in the burdens and benefits of global economic cooperation, but no unilateral duty to share fairly, where such institutions are not in place. Since non-contribution on the part of those unable to contribute involves no failure of recognition, the disabled do not fall outside the scope of distributive justice.
Analyse & Kritik – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.