Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2020)
The Right to a Stable Climate is the Constitutional Question of the Twenty-First Century
Doori Song (2019)
Judicial Approaches to Political Questions: A Comparative Study of the United States and South KoreaInternational and Comparative Law Review, 19
see also Climate Change and Future Generations Lawsuit in Colombia: Key Excerpts from the Supreme Court's Decision
Adina Rosenbaum, D. Gilman (2009)
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
(2015)
Associated Press. US temporarily stops youth climate lawsuit days before trial
E. Walker (2004)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Climate Change and Future Generations Lawsuit in Colombia: Key Excerpts from the Supreme Court's Decision [online
(2020)
Juliana v United States: The unresolved case already making a difference
US temporarily stops youth climate lawsuit days before trial in Oregon
Melissa Powers (2018)
Juliana v United States : The next frontier in US climate mitigation?Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
(2020)
Trump Administration Takes a ‘Drastic
J. Fairlie (1905)
The United States Department of JusticeMichigan Law Review, 3
(2020)
O‘ROURKE, Ciara
R. Weaver, Douglas Kysar (2017)
Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of CatastropheNotre Dame Law Review, 93
(2005)
No. C06-05755
Humberto Ballén (1983)
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Sala de Casación Civil
(2020)
vs USA United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Portland Oregon case
Greenpeace Nordic Ass'n and Nature and Youth v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy
Rabab Ali v Federation of Pakistan & Another
Stichting Urgenda v Government of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment)
The 11-Year Old Suing Trump Over Climate Change. The Atlantic
(2017)
Courting Disaster: Climate Change and the Adjudication of Disaster
(2020)
The Supreme Court Stepped in to Stall a Climate Lawsuit
(2007)
Environmental Protection Agency, 22 Ill.549 U.S
SummaryThis article analyses the protracted climate change case of Juliana v United States of America. We consider the history of the case as well as the most recent judgment of the Federal Court of Appeals, which seems to be the final judgment in this case as it is not foreseen that the case will be appealed with any success. The Juliana case provided hope for many people in the United States that the case would be able to succeed and possibly alter climate change policy in the country. Although the latest judgment will be disappointing to climate change activists and those affected by climate change, we agree with the ruling of the majority opinion in the Court of Appeals case and believe that it is a sound legal decision despite its general disapprobation.
International and Comparative Law Review – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.