Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The year 2018 was the seventieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Has it aged well? Does it still have the inspiring force that made it possible for the grammar of human rights to become dominant all over the world, even when and where its universal character was contested in the name of regional or specific language of rights? Does it need to be expanded to include rights that were inconceivable in 1948?This special issue of Human Affairs is aimed at answering these and other questions connected to the idea of human rights. Although the idea itself is very old, and has been widely discussed by moral, political and legal philosophers, and more recently law theorists, historians, sociologists and anthropologists, it still creates divisions between scholars and governments, and the courts and institutions of civil society. No consensus has been reached regarding the status of human rights or the exact meaning of the adjective “human”. When the Stoics introduced the idea that all human beings are to be considered children of the same mother, of Nature, into Western philosophy, nobody was in doubt about the meaning of this appeal. Today, with the possibilities that have opened up
Human Affairs – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.