Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising from a relevance theoretic point of view

Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising from a relevance theoretic point of view Abstract This study on the Speech Act of Promising builds on an article by Egner (2005) which claims that in many African Societies a promise is most often made not to be committed to its content but to be polite and save one�s own or the addressee�s face. While Egner opts for a Speech Act Theory approach to explain the phenomenon and comes to the conclusion that the speech act of promising may occur minus commitment, thus refuting the standard SAT claim, I have opted to treat the issue within Relevance Theory and claim that a true speech act of promising cannot be without commitment since it is a performative and institutional speech act which has to be committed by its very nature. I have rather explained that the concept PROMISE can be used as an ad hoc concept PROMISE* which conveys a speech act of saying that and which is a broadened version of the encoded concept to make commitment optional and include issues of politeness and face saving. While Egner claims that a committed speech act can be determined by linguistic indication most of the time I claim that the intended interpretation falls out naturally from the relevance theoretic comprehension procedure which is: �Follow the path of least effort in determining cognitive effects and stop when your expectation of relevance is fulfilled.� Unlike Egner I claim that at the root of using non-committed promises as a face saving device are shame oriented cultures that need these kinds of mechanisms for politeness more than guilt oriented cultures. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Lodz Papers in Pragmatics de Gruyter

Intercultural aspects of the speech act of promising from a relevance theoretic point of view

Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/intercultural-aspects-of-the-speech-act-of-promising-from-a-relevance-5yyfhwrVBB
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the
ISSN
1895-6106
eISSN
1898-4436
DOI
10.1515/lpp-2012-0008
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract This study on the Speech Act of Promising builds on an article by Egner (2005) which claims that in many African Societies a promise is most often made not to be committed to its content but to be polite and save one�s own or the addressee�s face. While Egner opts for a Speech Act Theory approach to explain the phenomenon and comes to the conclusion that the speech act of promising may occur minus commitment, thus refuting the standard SAT claim, I have opted to treat the issue within Relevance Theory and claim that a true speech act of promising cannot be without commitment since it is a performative and institutional speech act which has to be committed by its very nature. I have rather explained that the concept PROMISE can be used as an ad hoc concept PROMISE* which conveys a speech act of saying that and which is a broadened version of the encoded concept to make commitment optional and include issues of politeness and face saving. While Egner claims that a committed speech act can be determined by linguistic indication most of the time I claim that the intended interpretation falls out naturally from the relevance theoretic comprehension procedure which is: �Follow the path of least effort in determining cognitive effects and stop when your expectation of relevance is fulfilled.� Unlike Egner I claim that at the root of using non-committed promises as a face saving device are shame oriented cultures that need these kinds of mechanisms for politeness more than guilt oriented cultures.

Journal

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics – de Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.