Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Hagedoorn, Myriam Cloodt (2003)
Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?Research Policy, 32
F. Damanpour (1991)
Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and ModeratorsAcademy of Management Journal, 34
Janne Antikainen, P. Vartiainen (2005)
Polycentricity in Finland: From Structure to StrategyBuilt Environment, 31
G. Ahuja, R. Katila (2001)
Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal studyStrategic Management Journal, 22
A. Pike, A. Rodríguez‐Pose, J. Tomaney (2007)
What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?Regional Studies, 41
Peter Chen, P. Popovich (2002)
Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures
Alessandro Roncaglia (2017)
A Guide to the Literature
Brian Ceh (2001)
Regional innovation potential in the United States: Evidence of spatial transformationPapers in Regional Science, 80
I. Hasan, Christopher Tucci (2010)
The Innovation-Economic Growth Nexus: Global EvidenceResearch Policy, 39
J. Reenen (1997)
Employment and Technological Innovation: Evidence from U.K. Manufacturing FirmsJournal of Labor Economics, 15
A. Arundel (1998)
127Research Policy, 27
Jianmin Tang (2006)
Competition and innovation behaviourResearch Policy, 35
Apiwat Ratanawaraha, K. Polenske (2007)
The Economic Geography of Innovation: Measuring the geography of innovation: a literature review
Z. Acs (2002)
1069Research Policy, 31
M. Crosby (2000)
Patents, Innovation and GrowthEconomic Record, 76
A. Varga (2001)
Universities and Regional Economic Development: Does Agglomeration Matter?
Alex Coad, Rekha Rao (2008)
Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approachResearch Policy, 37
Wulong *, Jianmin Tang (2004)
Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing industriesEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 13
J. Jauhiainen (2008)
Regional and Innovation Policies in Finland – Towards Convergence and/or Mismatch?Regional Studies, 42
E. Brouwer, A. Kleinknecht (1999)
Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro dataResearch Policy, 28
Maria Vaz, M. Cesário, Sílvia Fernandes (2006)
Interaction between innovation in small firms and their environments: An exploratory studyEuropean Planning Studies, 14
F. Molina-Morales, F. Mas-Verdu (2008)
Intended Ties with Local Institutions as Factors in Innovation: An Application to Spanish Manufacturing FirmsEuropean Planning Studies, 16
D. Czarnitzki, Hanna Hottenrott (2009)
Are Local Milieus the Key to Innovation Performance?IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
A. Kleinknecht, K. montfort, E. Brouwer (2002)
The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation IndicatorsEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 11
Z. Acs, A. Varga (2002)
Geography, Endogenous Growth, and InnovationInternational Regional Science Review, 25
B. Cabrer-Borrás, G. Serrano-Domingo (2007)
Innovation and R&D spillover effects in Spanish regions: A spatial approachResearch Policy, 36
Seppo Siirilä, Lauri Hautamäki, J. Kuitunen, Timo Keski-Petäjä (1990)
Regional well-being variations in FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography, 168
A. Arundel, Isabelle Kabla (1998)
What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firmsResearch Policy, 27
K. Mikkonen (2002)
The competitive advantage of regions and small economic areas. The case of FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography, 180
C. Condit, Paul Bairoch, Christopher Braider (1990)
Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present by Paul Bairoch (review)Technology and Culture, 31
Catherine Co (2002)
Evolution of the Geography of Innovation: Evidence from Patent DataGrowth and Change, 33
Michael Ewers (2007)
Migrants, markets and multinationals: competition among world cities for the highly skilledGeoJournal, 68
M. Porter (2003)
The Economic Performance of RegionsRegional Studies, 37
A. Szajnowska-Wysocka (2009)
Theories of Regional and Local Development - Abridged Review, 12
(2006)
Innovation in knowledge intensive
B. Bilbao-Osorio, A. Rodríguez‐Pose (2004)
From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EUGrowth and Change, 35
G. Mitchell (1999)
Global Technology Policies for Economic GrowthTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 60
H. Goldstein, C. Renault (2004)
Contributions of Universities to Regional Economic Development: A Quasi-experimental ApproachRegional Studies, 38
Seppo Siirilä, M. Vaattovaara, V. Viljanen (2002)
Well-being in Finland: A comparison of municipalities and residential differentiation in two citiesFennia: International Journal of Geography, 180
L. Bettencourt, J. Lobo, D. Strumsky (2007)
Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan sizeResearch Policy, 36
J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson (2006)
The Oxford handbook of innovation
(2002)
The non-trivial choice
A. Arundel (2001)
The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriationResearch Policy, 30
R. Evangelista, S. Iammarino, Valeria Mastrostefano, A. Silvani (2001)
Measuring the regional dimension of innovation. Lessons from the Italian Innovation SurveyTechnovation, 21
A. Rodríguez‐Pose (1999)
Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in EuropeGrowth and Change, 30
B. Ebersberger, Vtt Publications (2005)
The Impact of Public R&D Funding
E. Brouwer, H. Budil-Nadvornikova, A. Kleinknecht (1999)
Are Urban Agglomerations a Better Breeding Place for Product Innovation? An Analysis of New Product AnnouncementsRegional Studies, 33
C. Hipp, H. Grupp (2005)
Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologiesResearch Policy, 34
Allison Bramwell, D. Wolfe (2008)
Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of WaterlooResearch Policy, 37
A. Sterlacchini (2008)
R&D, higher education and regional growth: Uneven linkages among European regionsResearch Policy, 37
P. Hanel (2008)
THE USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND INNOVATION BY MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN CANADAEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 17
H. Piekkola (2006)
Knowledge and Innovation Subsidies as Engines for Growth. The Competitiveness of Finnish Regions
T. Gössling, R. Rutten (2007)
Innovation in RegionsEuropean Planning Studies, 15
A. Faggian, P. McCann (2008)
Human Capital, Graduate Migration and Innovation in British RegionsCambridge Journal of Economics, 33
R. Florida (2003)
Cities and the Creative ClassCity & Community, 2
Z. Acs, L. Anselin, A. Varga (2002)
Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledgeResearch Policy, 31
S. Thornhill (2006)
Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimesJournal of Business Venturing, 21
D. Barkley, Ark Henry, S. Nair (2006)
Regional Innovation Systems: Implications for Nonmetropolitan Areas and Workers in the SouthGrowth and Change, 37
Franz Tödtling, Patrick Lehner, Michaela Trippl (2006)
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge linksEuropean Planning Studies, 14
R. Florida, C. Mellander, Kevin Stolarick (2008)
Inside the Black Box of Regional Development - human capital, the creative class and toleranceJournal of Economic Geography, 8
J. Simmie, James Sennett, Peter Wood, D. Hart (2002)
Innovation in Europe: A Tale of Networks, Knowledge and Trade in Five CitiesRegional Studies, 36
R. Sternberg, O. Arndt (2001)
The Firm or the Region: What Determines the Innovation Behavior of European Firms?Economic Geography, 77
A. Arundel (2001)
611Research Policy, 30
Innovation and Regional Socio-Economic Development - Evidence from the Finnish Local Administrative Units (1) It is often argued that innovation plays a key role in the economic growth of regions. Therefore, the impacts of innovation on the socio-economic development of regions have been widely discussed in previous studies, but with divergent areal coverage, methods, and datasets. As a point for departure, these relationships redrawn from international literature are tested here with a single dataset from Finnish local administrative units and with coherent methods. As there does not seem to be a generally accepted indicator for innovation which can claim to be superior, despite the growing literature on the subject, research and development (R&D), and patent statistics are used in this paper to represent innovation activity. The significant, strong, and positive relationship between innovation and traditional socio-economic variables is verified using Finnish regions.
Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series – de Gruyter
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.