Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question

Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question AbstractIn this paper, I discuss critically the traditional view of reanalysis, taking into account recent debates about the concept. In particular, I argue that the debate about reanalysis tends to conflate two interpretations of reanalysis: reanalysis as a type of language change among other ones, and reanalysis as the recognition or “ratification” of any kind of change. I offer a possible explanation of that potential confusion. I then illustrate this distinction using the history of the French est-ce que question as a case study. I report original diachronic research on the history of that construction. Further, I discuss implications both at a conceptual-theoretical level and at a practical level for further diachronic research. The paper concludes with a summary and discussion of the findings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Open Linguistics de Gruyter

Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question

Open Linguistics , Volume 4 (1): 14 – Jan 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/inferencing-reanalysis-and-the-history-of-the-french-est-ce-que-wIPYgPhMnQ
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2018 Richard Waltereit, published by De Gruyter
ISSN
2300-9969
eISSN
2300-9969
DOI
10.1515/opli-2018-0004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I discuss critically the traditional view of reanalysis, taking into account recent debates about the concept. In particular, I argue that the debate about reanalysis tends to conflate two interpretations of reanalysis: reanalysis as a type of language change among other ones, and reanalysis as the recognition or “ratification” of any kind of change. I offer a possible explanation of that potential confusion. I then illustrate this distinction using the history of the French est-ce que question as a case study. I report original diachronic research on the history of that construction. Further, I discuss implications both at a conceptual-theoretical level and at a practical level for further diachronic research. The paper concludes with a summary and discussion of the findings.

Journal

Open Linguisticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2018

References