Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abstract: The question of what exactly Heraclitus’ views on religion were is one of the most difficult and controversial of all the problems that make his philosophy so perplexing, and so fascinating. I outline four images of Heraclitus that have shaped understandings of his views on religion in the past, and then provide an interpretation of the relevant texts, especially B5, B14, B15, B32, B93, and B51 D-K. The gods that interest Heraclitus are not those of the poets but those of the city and the mysteries, and it is these that he tries to set into relation with his philosophical views. The result is not so much polemic as rather selection and accommodation. Unlike most of his Presocratic colleagues, Heraclitus does not discard wholesale the traditional apparatus of Greek gods and replace it with his own philosophical henotheism. Instead, he seems in general to be applying his philosophical reason to the phenomenon of Greek religion with a fundamentally conservative intent, rejecting what he must, saving what he can by reinterpreting it.
Rhizomata – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.