Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Abstract This paper (re-)examines two sources of information about Heraclitus’ fragment 22 B 52 DK, which are at the same time the sources of confusion when it comes to its interpretation: the meanings of the lexical elements that constitute the saying and the ancient testimonies that refer to it. The relevant ancient sources commonly recognise the importance of the theme of the unity of opposites in the fragment and the analysis of the fragment’s wording yields the same conclusion. It renders the saying as an original take on the popular subject of the unpredictability of human existence: the central paradox of the πεσσεία-playing child illustrates the essential uniformity behind the apparent changeability of the course of human life. Thus, the fragment may be seen as yet another expression of the universal rule of law and regularity characteristic of Heraclitus’ philosophy.
Rhizomata – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.