Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Mason (2012)
Informal Debate on the Issues Relating to Terminology and Clarification of Concept in Respect of the EU e-Signature LegislationScriptorium, 9
D. Olzen (2012)
Musielak, Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz; Musielak/Borth, Familiengerichtliches Verfahren 1. und 2. BuchJuristische Rundschau, 2012
Abbo Junker (2020)
Internationales Zivilprozessrecht
Naděžda Rozehnalová (2013)
Rozhodčí řízení v mezinárodním a vnitrostátním obchodním styku
S. Leible, Monika Görtz-Leible (2009)
Musielak, Hans-Joachim (Hrsg.): Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung : mit Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz. 6. Aufl. München, 2008
Klaus Lionnet (2001)
Handbuch der internationalen und nationalen Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit : Systematische Darstellung der privaten Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit für die Praxis der Parteien
Rudolf Jhering (2009)
Geist des Römischen Rechts auf den Verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung
E. Kieninger (2018)
Lieder, Jan: Die rechtsgeschäftliche Sukzession. Eine methodenpluralistische Grundlagenuntersuchung zum deutschen Zivilrecht und Zivilprozessrecht sowie zum Internationalen und Europäischen PrivatrechRabels Zeitschrift Fuer Auslaendisches Und Internationales Privatrecht, 82
A. Berg (1981)
The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 : towards a uniform judicial interpretation
Rolf Schütze (2012)
Schiedsgericht und Schiedsverfahren
Adolf Baumbach, W. Lauterbach, J. Albers, P. Hartmann (2015)
Zivilprozessordnung : mit FamFG, GVG und anderen Nebengesetzen
H. Fasching (1959)
Kommentar zu den Zivilprozessgesetzen
J. Lachmann (2008)
Handbuch für die Schiedsgerichtspraxis
SummaryThe arbitration agreement is one of the basic pillars and conditions of arbitration, without which arbitration cannot take place. In addition to the content requirements, it must be concluded in the required form in accordance with the relevant regulations. This article deals with the form of an arbitration agreement and on the example of various legal orders it shows the possibilities that can be encountered in the issue of formal requirements on an arbitration agreement. The comparative approach is intended to underline the importance of arbitration in international context and the importance of uniform, or at least similar, regulation from the point of view of legal certainty, for example. Despite the partial differences, it can be positively stated that the legal systems strive for a balance between informality and excessive formalism, and respect (also for practice) important principles important such as potius valeat actus quam pereat or the autonomy of the parties.
International and Comparative Law Review – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.