Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1994)
Anti-Clinton Platform.
Glen Smith, Kathleen Searles (2014)
Who Let the (Attack) Dogs Out? New Evidence for Partisan Media EffectsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 78
Barry Burden (2004)
Candidate Positioning in US Congressional ElectionsBritish Journal of Political Science, 34
R. Born (1990)
Surge and Decline, Negative Voting, and the Midterm Loss Phenomenon: A Simultaneous Choice AnalysisAmerican Journal of Political Science, 34
Joseph Bafumi, Robert Erikson, Christopher Wlezien (2014)
National Polls, District Information, and House Seats: Forecasting the 2014 Midterm ElectionPS: Political Science & Politics, 47
A. Abramowitz (2014)
Forecasting the 2014 Midterm Elections with the Generic Ballot ModelPS: Political Science & Politics, 47
P. Sellers (1998)
Strategy and Background in Congressional CampaignsAmerican Political Science Review, 92
(2010)
The Dynamics of Campaign Preferences
Alfred Cuzán (2010)
Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010?PS: Political Science & Politics, 43
H. Stanley, R. Niemi (2013)
Vital Statistics on American Politics 2013-2014
Robin Marra, Charles Ostrom (1989)
Explaining Seat Change in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1950-86American Journal of Political Science, 33
M. Lewis-Beck, C. Tien (2014)
Congressional Election Forecasting: Structure-X Models for 2014PS: Political Science & Politics, 47
S. Finer (1958)
Politics, Parties, and Pressure GroupsPolitical Studies, 6
James Campbell (2014)
The Seats-in-Trouble Forecast of the 2014 Midterm Congressional ElectionsPS: Political Science & Politics, 47
Noah Kaplan, D. Park, Travis Ridout (2006)
Dialogue in American Political Campaigns? An Examination of Issue Convergence in Candidate Television AdvertisingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 50
(2012)
News, Politics, and NegativityPolitical Communication, 32
(2014)
28 Words That Democrats Really Wish President Obama Didn’t Say Today.
Andrew Busch (1999)
Horses in midstream : U.S. midterm elections and their consequences, 1894-1998
Joseph Bafumi, Robert Erikson, Christopher Wlezien (2010)
Forecasting House Seats from Generic Congressional Polls: The 2010 Midterm ElectionPS: Political Science & Politics, 43
D. Hibbs (2010)
The 2010 Midterm Election for the US House of RepresentativesPolitical Behavior: Voting & Public Opinion eJournal
A. Abramowitz (2018)
Will Democrats Catch a Wave? The Generic Ballot Model and the 2018 US House ElectionsPS: Political Science & Politics, 51
(2014)
Political Science and Politics 43 (October): 627–630
Alfred Cuzán, C. Bundrick (2006)
WILL THE REPUBLICANS RETAIN CONTROL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN 2006
Costas Panagopoulos (2011)
The Dynamics of Voter Preferences in the 2010 Congressional Midterm ElectionsThe Forum, 8
R. Lau, G. Pomper (2002)
Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate electionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 46
G. Jacobson, S. Kernell (1981)
Strategy and choice in congressional elections
(2014)
Battle for the Senate: How the GOP Did It.
F. Wilson (1940)
The American CommonwealthThe Review of Politics, 2
P. Herrnson (1995)
Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington
Todd Belt (2007)
How Voters Decide: Information Processing during Election Campaigns – By Richard R. Lau and David P. RedlawskPolitical Psychology, 28
B. Highton, Eric McGhee, John Sides (2014)
Election Fundamentals and Polls Favor the RepublicansPS: Political Science & Politics, 47
R. Lau, L. Sigelman, Ivy Rovner (2007)
The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic ReassessmentThe Journal of Politics, 69
G. Jacobson (1983)
The Politics of Congressional Elections
J. Druckman, Martin Kifer, Michael Parkin (2010)
Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006Political Communication, 27
J. Druckman, Martin Kifer, Michael Parkin (2009)
Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 103
A. Campbell (1960)
SURGE AND DECLINE: A STUDY OF ELECTORAL CHANGEPublic Opinion Quarterly, 24
James Campbell (2006)
Forecasting the 2006 National Elections to the U.S. House of RepresentativesThe Forum, 4
A. Abramowitz (2001)
It's Monica, Stupid: The Impeachment Controversy and the 1998 Midterm ElectionLegislative Studies Quarterly, 26
C. Brians, M. Wattenberg (1996)
Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and NewspapersAmerican Journal of Political Science, 40
A. Abramowitz (1995)
The End of the Democratic Era? 1994 and the Future of Congressional Election ResearchPolitical Research Quarterly, 48
Paul Brace, B. Hinckley (1993)
Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents
Robert Erikson (1988)
The Puzzle of Midterm LossThe Journal of Politics, 50
S. Kernell (1977)
Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting: An Alternative Explanation of the Midterm Congressional Decline of the President's PartyAmerican Political Science Review, 71
Joseph Bafumi, Robert Erikson, Christopher Wlezien (2010)
Balancing, Generic Polls and Midterm Congressional ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 72
Ronald Gaddie (1997)
Congressional Seat Swings: Revisiting Exposure in House ElectionsPolitical Research Quarterly, 50
Philipp Nadel (2016)
Presidential Approval A Sourcebook
M. Lewis-Beck, C. Tien (2010)
The Referendum Model: A 2010 Congressional ForecastPS: Political Science & Politics, 43
B. Oppenheimer, James Stimson, R. Waterman (1986)
Interpreting U. S. Congressional Elections: The Exposure ThesisLegislative Studies Quarterly, 11
G. Jacobson (1989)
Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86American Political Science Review, 83
James Campbell (2010)
The Seats in Trouble Forecast of the 2010 Elections to the U.S. HousePS: Political Science & Politics, 43
B. Nyhan, J. Montgomery (2015)
Connecting the candidates: : consultant networks and the diffusion of campaign strategy in American congressional electionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 59
D. Stone (2018)
The 2017 James Madison Award Lecture: The Ethics of CountingPS: Political Science & Politics, 51
E. Tufte (1975)
Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 69
K. Fridkin, P. Kenney (2004)
Do Negative Messages Work?American Politics Research, 32
Gerald Wright, Michael Berkman (1986)
Candidates and Policy in United States Senate ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 80
C. Crabtree, C. Davenport, E. Chenoweth, D. Moss, J. Earl, E. Ritter, Christopher Sullivan (2017)
Contentious Politics in the Trump EraPS: Political Science & Politics, 51
Jon Dalager (1996)
Voters, Issues, and Elections: Are the Candidates' Messages Getting Through?The Journal of Politics, 58
R. Waterman, B. Oppenheimer, James Stimson (1991)
Sequence and Equilibrium in Congressional Elections: An Integrated ApproachThe Journal of Politics, 53
E. Eisenach (2013)
Wilson, 11
Carl Klarner, S. Buchanan (2006)
Forecasting the 2006 Elections for the U.S. House of RepresentativesPS: Political Science & Politics, 39
S. Skaperdas, B. Grofman (1995)
Modeling Negative CampaigningAmerican Political Science Review, 89
Joseph Bafumi, Robert Erikson, Christopher Wlezien (2018)
Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District InformationPS: Political Science & Politics, 51
Lynn Vavreck (2001)
The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic CandidateAmerican Politics Research, 29
John Mueller (1973)
War, presidents, and public opinion
A. Abramowitz (2010)
How Large a Wave? Using the Generic Ballot to Forecast the 2010 Midterm ElectionsPS: Political Science & Politics, 43
James Murphy, R. Wolfinger, James Piereson (2008)
Determinants of the Outcomes of Midterm Congressional Elections
M. Lodge, M. Steenbergen, Shawn Brau (1995)
The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate EvaluationAmerican Political Science Review, 89
(2005)
Combined File
J. Snyder, S. Ansolabehere (2001)
Candidate Positioning in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 45
A. Abramowitz (2006)
Using the Generic Vote to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate ElectionsThe Forum, 4
G. Jacobson, S. Kernell (1990)
National Forces in the 1986 U. S. House ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 15
R. Born (1986)
Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive VotersAmerican Political Science Review, 80
James Campbell (2011)
The Midterm Landslide of 2010: A Triple Wave ElectionThe Forum, 8
James Campbell (1993)
The presidential pulse of congressional elections
D. Kriner, Liam Schwartz (2009)
Partisan Dynamics and the Volatility of Presidential ApprovalBritish Journal of Political Science, 39
(2005)
Political Advertising in 2002
S. Kernell (1978)
Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of AnomaliesAmerican Political Science Review, 72
P. Herrnson, James Curry (2011)
Issue Voting and Partisan Defections in Congressional ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 36
Brian Newman, Charles Ostrom (2002)
Explaining Seat Changes in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1950–98Legislative Studies Quarterly, 27
James Campbell (1987)
The Revised Theory of Surge and DeclineAmerican Journal of Political Science, 31
A. Abramowitz (1985)
Economic Conditions, Presidential Popularity, and Voting Behavior in Midterm Congressional ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 47
James Campbell (2018)
The Seats-in-Trouble Forecasts of the 2018 Midterm Congressional ElectionsPS: Political Science & Politics, 51
Larry Bartels (1993)
Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media ExposureAmerican Political Science Review, 87
AbstractMidterm congressional elections are referenda on the president not by happenstance but by design, as the opposition party and its candidates attack the administration when political conditions provide the opportunity. Models for explaining and predicting the number of seats won by the president’s party incorporating the number of seats held before the election, prior election results, change in status of the economy, and presidential evaluation data conditioned by strategy of the opposition party are presented. These models improve upon traditional models of midterm election explanations and predictions, providing parsimonious, theory-driven, and accurate models of midterm election outcomes.
The Forum – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 26, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.