Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Experiences of External Interference Among Finnish Journalists: Prevalence, methods and implications

Experiences of External Interference Among Finnish Journalists: Prevalence, methods and implications AbstractThis study examines the prevalence, methods and implications of external interference among Finnish journalists based on survey responses from 875 working journalists. The definition of external interference used in the study encompasses all active and invasive methods external actors use to interfere in the journalistic process with the objective to influence editorial content. The findings indicate that low-level interference in everyday journalistic practices and mediated verbal abuse are the most frequent types of external interference. While severe interference is rare, results show that the perceived risk of interference causes concern and self-censorship among the respondents. The results are in line with previous Nordic and European studies, and underline how external interference may have detrimental effects on journalistic autonomy also in countries with strong legal, institutional and cultural safeguards of press freedom. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nordicom Review de Gruyter

Experiences of External Interference Among Finnish Journalists: Prevalence, methods and implications

Nordicom Review , Volume 40 (1): 19 – Feb 1, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/experiences-of-external-interference-among-finnish-journalists-dpsmOjR3sQ
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2019 Ilmari Hiltunen, published by Sciendo
ISSN
2001-5119
eISSN
2001-5119
DOI
10.2478/nor-2018-0016
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThis study examines the prevalence, methods and implications of external interference among Finnish journalists based on survey responses from 875 working journalists. The definition of external interference used in the study encompasses all active and invasive methods external actors use to interfere in the journalistic process with the objective to influence editorial content. The findings indicate that low-level interference in everyday journalistic practices and mediated verbal abuse are the most frequent types of external interference. While severe interference is rare, results show that the perceived risk of interference causes concern and self-censorship among the respondents. The results are in line with previous Nordic and European studies, and underline how external interference may have detrimental effects on journalistic autonomy also in countries with strong legal, institutional and cultural safeguards of press freedom.

Journal

Nordicom Reviewde Gruyter

Published: Feb 1, 2019

Keywords: journalism; autonomy; external interference; harassment; intimidation

References