Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Lazowski (2012)
Withdrawal from the European Union and alternatives to membershipEuropean Law Review
(2015)
Splendid isolation or continued cooperation? Options for a State after withdrawal from the EU, in Columbia
Andrea Circolo, Ondrej Hamuľák, Ondrej Blažo (2018)
Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union: How to Understand the ‘Right’ of the Member State to Withdraw the European Union?
Tomaso Perassi (1953)
Lezioni di diritto internazionale
(2018)
Art. 50 TUE – How to understand the ‘right’ of the Member State to Withdraw from the European Union
Enrico Nano, S. Tagliapietra (2017)
Brexit goes nuclear: The consequences of leaving EuratomPolicy briefs
L. Kiss (2017)
General Issues of Post-Brexit EU LawEuropean Public Law: EU eJournal
Hannes Hofmeister (2010)
‘Should I Stay or Should I Go?": A Critical Analysis of the Right to Withdraw from the EUWiley-Blackwell: European Law Journal
V. Stehlík (2016)
Brexit, EEA and the Free Movement of Workers: Structural Considerations on FlexibilityInternational and Comparative Law Review, 16
(2017)
Brevi note sulle conclusioni del primo accordo di recesso: Brexit deal, in rivista eurojus.it, 2017
(2013)
Diritto delle organizzazioni internazionali: Terza edizione
KOROWICZ (1961)
Organisations internationales et souveraineté des états membres Paris ŁAZOWSKI Adam Withdrawal from the European Union and Alternatives to Member - ship in ŁAZOWSKI Adam Unilateral withdrawal from the EU : realistic scenario or a folly ? in ofEuropean Law Review Journal European Public Policy, 37
Lucien Nizard (1965)
Le retrait de l'Indonésie des Nations Unies, 11
John Whitton, Marc Korowicz (1962)
Organisations Internationales et Souverainete des Etats Membres.American Journal of International Law, 56
Claudio Zanghì (2001)
Diritto delle organizzazioni internazionali
A. Łazowski (2016)
Unilateral withdrawal from the EU: realistic scenario or a folly?Journal of European Public Policy, 23
ICLR (2018)
Vol No Published by Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic ISSN print ISSN online STEINBEIS Maximilian Five Questions on Brexit to JO SHAW in Verfassungs - blogSHAW, 18
(2016)
Oltre la Brexit: brevi note sulle implicazioni giuridiche e politiche per il futuro prossimo dell’Unione europea, in federalismi.it, rivista di diritto pubblico italiano
R. Monaco (1985)
Lezioni di organizzazione internazionale
AbstractThe paper focuses on the very topical issue of conclusion of the membership of the State, namely the United Kingdom, in European integration structures. The question of termination of membership in European Communities and European Union has not been tackled for a long time in the sources of European law. With the adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon (2009), the institute of 'unilateral' withdrawal was introduced. It´s worth to say that exit clause was intended as symbolic in its nature, in fact underlining the status of Member States as sovereign entities. That is why this institute is very general and the legal regulation of the exercise of withdrawal contains many gaps. One of them is a question of absolute or relative nature of exiting from integration structures. Today’s “exit clause” (Art. 50 of Treaty on European Union) regulates only the termination of membership in the European Union and is silent on the impact of such a step on membership in the European Atomic Energy Community. The presented paper offers an analysis of different variations of the interpretation and solution of the problem. It´s based on the independent solution thesis and therefore rejects an automatism approach. The paper and topic is important and original especially because in the multitude of scholarly writings devoted to Brexit questions, vast majority of them deals with institutional questions, the interpretation of Art. 50 of Treaty on European Union; the constitutional matters at national UK level; future relation between EU and UK and political bargaining behind such as all that. The question of impact on withdrawal on Euratom membership is somehow underrepresented. Present paper attempts to fill this gap and accelerate the scholarly debate on this matter globally, because all consequences of Brexit already have and will definitely give rise to more world-wide effects.
International and Comparative Law Review – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.