Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Tobias Störzinger, Felix Carros, Anne Wierling, Catrin Misselhorn, R. Wieching (2020)
Categorizing Social Robots with Respect to Dimensions Relevant to Ethical, Social and Legal Implicationsi-com, 19
Felix Carros, Isabel Schwaninger, Adrian Preussner, D. Randall, R. Wieching, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, V. Wulf (2022)
Care Workers Making Use of Robots: Results of a Three-Month Study on Human-Robot Interaction within a Care HomeProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Looi Choy (2014)
The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: Comparison and Complimentary between Qualitative and Quantitative ApproachesIOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19
F. Tuli (2011)
The Basis of Distinction Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Social Science: Reflection on Ontological, Epistemological and Methodological PerspectivesEthiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6
Felix Carros, Johanna Meurer, Diana Löffler, David Unbehaun, S. Matthies, Inga Koch, R. Wieching, D. Randall, Marc Hassenzahl, V. Wulf (2020)
Exploring Human-Robot Interaction with the Elderly: Results from a Ten-Week Case Study in a Care HomeProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A. Tashakkori, J. Creswell (2007)
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed MethodsJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 1
I. Wagner (2018)
Critical Reflections on Participation in Design
AbstractResearch on Human-Robot Interaction is increasing as system become widely available and reached a level that enables smooth interactions. Yet, many research projects act in a silo mentality, in regard of participatory, ethical, or legal matters of social robotics. Knowledge about specific challenges is not universal and has often to be transferred from non-robotic contexts. We present findings in the three dimensions: participatory design, ethics for social robots and legal aspects. We accompanied eight research projects on social robots in real-world scenarios for three years. During that time, we spoke, observed, and helped (where possible) the research projects. This gave us specific insights into their work. Our findings work in three dimensions. In participatory design we observed that the trust relationship to users is essential to gain truthful insights and that a mixed method approach is promising. Regarding ethical aspects, we could see that ethical matters should be answered early on. And in the legal dimensions we noticed that the GDPR regulations are a challenge that often requires the help of experts. This work is reflecting on the observation of eight projects and is collecting lessons learned to help future projects and to learn from previous work.
i-com – de Gruyter
Published: Aug 1, 2022
Keywords: HRI; Human-Robot Interaction; Social Robot; Assistive Robots; Zoomorphic Robots; Ethic; Legal; Participatory Design; Wizard-of-Oz; long-term; Qualitative Methods; Quantitative Methods; GDPR; Research Project; Meta Research; MEESTAR; Living Lab; User-Centered Design
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.