Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1990)
Probleme der Neutralität staatlichen Handelns: Sicherung von Akzeptanz, in: W. Hoffmann-Riem/E. Schmidt-Assmann (Hrsg.), Konfliktbewältigung durch Verhandlungen
(1995)
Stimmrecht und politische Verständigung, Basel-Frankfurt
(1990)
Kritik von Verhandlungslösungen, insbesondere von mittlerunterstützten Entscheidungen, in: W. Hoffmann-Riem/E. Schmidt-Assmann (Hrsg.), Konfliktbewältigung durch Verhandlungen
(1990)
The Importance of Compensation and Joint Gains in Environmental Disputes, in: W. Hoffmann-RiemfE. Schmidt-Assmann (Hrsg.), Konfliktbewältigung durch Verhandlungen
(1997)
BohnetfB. S
(1993)
Verhalten zwischen sozialen Gruppen: Die Theorie der sozialen Identität
J. Matsusaka (1995)
Explaining voter turnout patterns: An information theoryPublic Choice, 84
(1990)
Verhandlungslösungen und Mittlereinsatz im Bereich der Verwaltung: Eine vergleichende Einführung, in: W. Hoffmann-Riem/E. Schmidt-Assmann (Hrsg.), Konfliktbewältigung durch Verhandlungen
(1982)
Risk and Culture, Berkeley Downs, A
(1996)
Trust in Organizations, Thousand Oaks
David Magleby (1984)
Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States
Silvo Lenart (1994)
Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media
(1992)
Regulatory Negotiation as Public Participation, Aufsatz für
T. Tyler (2021)
Why People Obey the Law
Ortwin Renn (1993)
Risikodialog statt Sankt-Florians-Prinzip : Erfahrungen aus einem Modellversuch im Kanton Aargau
A. Lupia (1994)
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 88
G. Tullock (1959)
Problems of Majority VotingJournal of Political Economy, 67
S. Hadden (1995)
Regulatory Negotiation as Citizen Participation: A Critique
(1990)
Mediation: Lösung von Umweltkonflikten durch Vermittlung - Praxisbericht zur Anwendung in der Kontroverse um die Sondermülldeponie Münchehagen
Abstract The goal of discourse-based decision-making is to free negotiations from self-interested, strategic interactions. In this paper it is argued that the absence of interests may lead to both efficiency losses and redistribution between participants of the discourse and outsiders. The latter effect is the stronger, the more personal relationships between discourse participants become. Therefore, it is essential to validate the recommendations arrived at in discourses in democratic decision-making processes that are driven by competition between different points of views and interests.
Analyse & Kritik – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.