Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Diestelkamp, Bernhard, Der deutsche König als oberster Richter im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter Eine neue Positionsbestimmung

Diestelkamp, Bernhard, Der deutsche König als oberster Richter im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter Eine... AbstractThe German king as highest judge in the Mid- to Late Medieval period. A new paradigm. Conventionally it is assumed that the king was the highest judge in the medieval Empire. However, many times this turns out to be a misconception. The idea of a ‘highest’ judge suggests a relationship of superiority and inferiority as well as successive stages of appeal which, in fact, did not exist in the customary law. The article analyzes sources from the late medieval Imperial Aulic Court examining when and in which contexts the term ‘highest judge’ was used first. Aside from little evidence in the 14th century numerous records can be found in 15th century documents. It is hardly a coincidence that these findings concur with the increase of references on appeal trials based on the learned law around this time. In this respect the designation of the king as the highest judge marks the transition of the judicial organization in the wake of the reception of the Roman and canon law. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung de Gruyter

Diestelkamp, Bernhard, Der deutsche König als oberster Richter im Hoch- und Spätmittelalter Eine neue Positionsbestimmung

Download PDF
36 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/diestelkamp-bernhard-der-deutsche-k-nig-als-oberster-richter-im-hoch-25OkBtq8Fr
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
ISSN
0323-4045
eISSN
2304-4861
DOI
10.1515/zrgg-2019-0004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe German king as highest judge in the Mid- to Late Medieval period. A new paradigm. Conventionally it is assumed that the king was the highest judge in the medieval Empire. However, many times this turns out to be a misconception. The idea of a ‘highest’ judge suggests a relationship of superiority and inferiority as well as successive stages of appeal which, in fact, did not exist in the customary law. The article analyzes sources from the late medieval Imperial Aulic Court examining when and in which contexts the term ‘highest judge’ was used first. Aside from little evidence in the 14th century numerous records can be found in 15th century documents. It is hardly a coincidence that these findings concur with the increase of references on appeal trials based on the learned law around this time. In this respect the designation of the king as the highest judge marks the transition of the judicial organization in the wake of the reception of the Roman and canon law.

Journal

Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung – de Gruyter

Published: Jun 26, 2019

There are no references for this article.