Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Goetze (1976)
MARGINALITY and MARGINALIZATION AS KEY CONCEPTS IN A SOCIOLOGY OF LATIN AMERICASociologia Ruralis, 16
Ana Aceska, Barbara Heer, A. Kaiser-Grolimund (2019)
Doing the City from the Margins: Critical Perspectives on Urban Marginality*Anthropological Forum, 29
R. Park (1915)
The City: Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the City EnvironmentAmerican Journal of Sociology, 20
A. Kerckhoff, T. Mccormick (1955)
Marginal Status and Marginal PersonalitySocial Forces, 34
Lloyd Braithwaite (2006)
SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND CULTURAL PLURALISMAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 83
R. Wright, Susan Wright (1972)
A Plea for a Further Refinement of the Marginal Man Theory, 33
A. Antonovsky (1956)
Toward a Refinement of the “Marginal Man” ConceptSocial Forces, 35
Mikael Mattlin (2005)
Structural and Institutional IntegrationCooperation and Conflict, 40
W. Wardwell (1955)
The Reduction of Strain in a Marginal Social RoleAmerican Journal of Sociology, 61
Karin Tamar, G. Bar-Oz, Shlomo Bunimovitz, Zvi Lederman, T. Dayan (2015)
Geography and Economic Preferences as Cultural Markers in a Border Town: The Faunal Remains from Tel Beth-Shemesh, IsraelInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 25
P. Ermakov, O. Fedotova (2015)
Social Marginality as an Object of Scientific ResearchProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197
J. Fichter (1953)
The Marginal Catholic: An Institutional ApproachSocial Forces, 32
Marie Fourny (2013)
The border as liminal space. A proposal for analyzing the emergence of a concept of the mobile border in the context of the AlpsRevue De Geographie Alpine-journal of Alpine Research
David Golovensky (1952)
The Marginal Man Concept: An Analysis and CritiqueSocial Forces, 30
W. Wardwell (1952)
A Marginal Professional Role: The ChiropractorSocial Forces, 30
H. Lefèbvre (1992)
La production de l'espace
A. Green (1947)
A Re-Examination of the Marginal Man ConceptSocial Forces, 26
R. Brightman (1995)
Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, RelexificationCultural Anthropology, 10
Danilyn Rutherford (2003)
Ethnography Without Culture? Modernity and Marginality in the Anthropology of IndonesiaReviews in Anthropology, 32
Fischer, Castañeda, Q. Castañeda, Fábián, Friedman, Hale, Handler, Kapferer, Kearney (1999)
Cultural Logic and Maya Identity: Rethinking Constructivism and Essentialism [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 40
Anath Vidas (2002)
THE CULTURE OF MARGINALITY: THE TEENEK PORTRAYAL OF SOCIAL DIFFERENCEEthnology, 41
L. Peattie (1980)
Anthropological Perspectives on the Concepts of Dualism, the Informal Sector, and Marginality in Developing Urban EconomiesInternational Regional Science Review, 5
J. Pilar, Jocelynda Udasco (2004)
Marginality Theory: The Lack of Construct ValidityHispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26
E. Wolf, J. Kahn, W. Roseberry, I. Wallerstein (1994)
Perilous Ideas: Race, Culture, People [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 35
Noel Gist (1967)
Cultural versus Social Marginality: The Anglo-Indian Case, 28
(2010)
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
F. Gatzweiler, H. Baumüller, C. Husmann, Joachim Braun (2011)
Marginality: Addressing the Root Causes of Extreme Poverty
H. Winchester, P. White (1988)
The Location of Marginalised Groups in the Inner CityEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 6
(2020)
The Modern World-SystemImmanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World
AbstractMarginality and liminality are concepts that are used in the study of the ancient Near East, although formal definitions for these terms are rarely given. This paper explores the history of the uses of these terms in social theory, discussing the origins of the terms in the writings of early twentieth-century thinkers such as Georg Simmel, Robert Ezra Park, and Victor Turner. It details how these ideas and concepts were debated by psychologists, sociologists, and anthropologists throughout the twentieth century, when these terms were adopted into Near Eastern studies. While these concepts were defined by social theorists, investigations of the archaeological, textual, and art-historical evidence from the ancient Near East show that they well reflect emic conceptualizations. Examples from Near Eastern contexts demonstrate the benefits of using flexible and multi-vocalic conceptualizations of marginality and liminality that still recognize the distinctiveness of these two issues. The paper concludes by offering different frameworks for applying these concepts to the study of the Bronze Age Near East.
Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History – de Gruyter
Published: Nov 1, 2022
Keywords: marginality; liminality; Bronze Age; ancient Near East; agency; social theory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.