Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Bayer, N. Bitiukova, Petra Bárd, Judit Szakács, A. Alemanno, Erik Uszkiewicz (2019)
Disinformation and Propaganda – Impact on the Functioning of the Rule of Law in the EU and its Member StatesCommRN: Communication Law & Policy: Europe (Topic)
Erica Borghard, Shawn Lonergan (2017)
The Logic of Coercion in CyberspaceSecurity Studies, 26
D. Searls (2004)
Hacking democracyLinux Journal, 2004
(2015)
Revolution hacking,
K. Giles, William Hagestad (2013)
Divided by a common language: Cyber definitions in Chinese, Russian and English2013 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON 2013)
(2014)
Cyber deterrence isn't MAD; it's mosaic
B. Crane, T. Schelling (1966)
Arms and InfluenceInternational Journal, 22
(2019)
Fake news, free speech, and foreign influence: the smart way the United States can combat disinformation
Conrad Wilton (2017)
Sony, Cyber Security, and Free Speech: Preserving the First Amendment in the Modern WorldPace Intellectual Property, Sports & Entertainment Law Forum
(2015)
Russia and its neighbours: old attitudes, new capabilities,
M. Gomez, Eula Villar (2018)
Fear, Uncertainty, and Dread: Cognitive Heuristics and Cyber ThreatsPolitics and Governance
(2015)
Cyber War in Perspective: Russian Aggression against Ukraine, Tallinn: NATO CCD COE Publications
K. Giles (2016)
Russia's 'New' Tools for Confronting the West: Continuity and Innovation in Moscow's Exercise of Power
Armand Derfner, J. Hebert (2016)
Voting Is SpeechYale Law & Policy Review, 34
Martin Libicki (2018)
Drawing inferences from cyber espionage2018 10th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)
Tom Christian (2019)
United Nations, General AssemblyMax Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law
N. Kostyuk, Y. Zhukov (2019)
Invisible Digital Front: Can Cyber Attacks Shape Battlefield Events?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63
(2013)
Congressional-executive commission on China roundtable China’s treatment of foreign journalists,
John Arquilla, D. Ronfeldt (1993)
Cyberwar is coming
A. Rapoport, T. Schelling (1961)
The Strategy of Conflict.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56
(2016)
‘ China ’ s secret weapon in the South China Sea : cyber attacks , ’ The Diplomat , 22 July
Quentin Hodgson (2018)
Understanding and countering cyber coercion2018 10th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon)
B. Valeriano, Benjamin Jensen, R. Maness (2018)
Cyber Strategy: The Evolving Character of Power and Coercion
(2017)
Strategic Cyber Deterrence: The Active Cyber Defense Option
(2015)
‘ Beyond ‘ cyber war ’ : Russia ’ s use of strategic cyber espionage and information operations in Ukraine
Eugénie Francoeur, age Laval (1949)
Universal Declaration of Human RightsAmerican Journal of International Law, 43
(2015)
‘ Missing in action : rhetoric on cyber warfare
(2015)
Bedep trojan malware spread by the Angler exploit kit gets political,
M. Schmitt (2018)
'Virtual' Disenfranchisement: Cyber Election Meddling in the Grey Zones of International LawChicago Journal of International Law, 19
(2016)
Inside the cunning, unprecedented hack of Ukraine’s power grid,
(2018)
‘ The untold story of NotPetya , the most devastating cyberattack
David Johnson, David Post (1996)
Law and Borders - the Rise of Law in CyberspaceCyberspace Law eJournal
(2016)
‘ Swaggering in cyberspace : busting the conventional wisdom on cyber coercion , ’ War on the Rocks , 28 June
AbstractThis article explores how cyber-attacks affect freedom of expression. It begins by outlining the literature on cyber coercion and exploring other conceptions of how offensive cyber operations have been used to shape adversary behaviour, including efforts to intimidate through cyberspace, and the concept of ‘cyber swaggering’. The article moves on to explore how cyber-attacks have been used to undermine electoral process, to erode free and fair media reporting, and how manipulation of social media can constitute a ‘virtual infiltration’ and ‘virtual occupation’ of the information domain. The article then explores how cyber-attacks conducted during the conflict in Ukraine have limited or otherwise affected freedom of expression. I argue that the wider effects of cyber operations on political, civil and human rights have been underexplored in the cyber security literature; that cyber-attacks have adversely affected freedom of expression in the conflict in Ukraine and in other political disputes; and that the coercion concept is ill-suited to accounting for the socio-psychological impact of modern cyber operations.
Baltic Journal of European Studies – de Gruyter
Published: Sep 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.