Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comment on B. Lemennicier's Paper

Comment on B. Lemennicier's Paper Meaning and Imperatives of Social Justice COMMENT ON R PAPER LEMENNICIER'S by Aristides N. Hatzis0 Professor Bertrand Lemennicier's paper describes, in broad outline, an analytical tool that aims to test and elaborate, but mainly to simplify and classify, the most significant conceptions and general theories on justice. I must confess that I was impressed by the game Professor Lemennicier played with "social interaction processes" and I will not deny that I consent to most of his conclusions, even though I do not feel especially convinced as to some of their consequences. I will try, within the limits of this brief commentary, to pose some questions and objections that are bound to be formed in the mind of a jurist, who, accustomed as he is to operating within a dogmatic science, views with a certain disbelief, also with a certain negative attitude, and surely with a strong feeling of awe, such games on something he considers as very important: justice. A jurist then, would say that a game of bridge is very different from democracy or market. He would point out that it is all very different when you are dealing with life itself, especially in those cases where http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines de Gruyter

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/comment-on-b-lemennicier-s-paper-uJA0ffiD3B

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the
ISSN
2194-5799
eISSN
2153-1552
DOI
10.1515/jeeh-1993-2-304
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Meaning and Imperatives of Social Justice COMMENT ON R PAPER LEMENNICIER'S by Aristides N. Hatzis0 Professor Bertrand Lemennicier's paper describes, in broad outline, an analytical tool that aims to test and elaborate, but mainly to simplify and classify, the most significant conceptions and general theories on justice. I must confess that I was impressed by the game Professor Lemennicier played with "social interaction processes" and I will not deny that I consent to most of his conclusions, even though I do not feel especially convinced as to some of their consequences. I will try, within the limits of this brief commentary, to pose some questions and objections that are bound to be formed in the mind of a jurist, who, accustomed as he is to operating within a dogmatic science, views with a certain disbelief, also with a certain negative attitude, and surely with a strong feeling of awe, such games on something he considers as very important: justice. A jurist then, would say that a game of bridge is very different from democracy or market. He would point out that it is all very different when you are dealing with life itself, especially in those cases where

Journal

Journal des Économistes et des Études Humainesde Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 1993

There are no references for this article.