Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Fehr, Colin Camerer (2007)
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferencesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 11
(2005)
Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience
Kosfeld (2005)
Heinrichs Oxytocin In - creases Trust in Humans inNature
R. Lucas (1977)
UNDERSTANDING BUSINESS CYCLESCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 5
Xiao (2005)
Emotion Expression in Human Punishment Behavior in Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences
Manski (1990)
The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior : A Best Case Analysis in of the AmericanJournal Statistical Association
Colin Camerer, G. Loewenstein, D. Prelec (2005)
Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform EconomicsCognitive Neuroscience eJournal
Erte Xiao, Daniel Houser (2005)
Emotion expression in human punishment behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 20
Daniel Houser, M. Keane, K. McCabe (2004)
Behavior in a dynamic decision problem: An analysis of experimental evidence using a bayesian type classification algorithm
McCabe (2001)
A Functional Imaging Study of Cooperation in Two - person Reciprocal Exchange in : Proceedings of the National Academy ofScience
(2003)
Rilling/J.A. Aronson/L.E. Nystrom/J.D
(2001)
Houser/L. Ryan/V. Smith/T
Mullainathan (2000)
Behavioral Economics : Entry in International En - cyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Cambridge Neural Correlates of Decision Variables in Parietal Cortex inNature
M. Platt, P. Glimcher (1999)
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortexNature, 400
(2006)
Pinocchio’s Pupil: Using Eyetracking and Pupil Dilation to Understand Truth-telling and Deception in Biased Transmission Games, Caltech working paper
C. Manski (1990)
The Use of Intentions Data to Predict Behavior: A Best-Case AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 85
(2000)
Behavioral Economics: Entry in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral
Lucas (1977)
Understanding Business Cycles in ence Series onPublic Policy
Sanfey (2003)
The Neu - ral Basis of Economic Decision - making in the Ultimatum Game inScience
Abstract For an economist, ultimate goals of neuroeconomic research include improving economic policy analysis. One path toward this goal is to use neuroeconomic data to advance economic theory, and productive efforts have been made towards that end. Equally important, though less studied, is how neuroeconomics can provide quantitative evidence on policy, and in particular the way in which it might inform structural econometric inference. This paper is a first step in that direction. We suggest here that key forms of preference (or decision strategy) heterogeneity can be identified by brain imaging studies and, consequently, linked stochastically to observable individual characteristics. Then, recognizing that brain-imaging studies are substantially costly, we derive conditions under which the probabilistic link between observable characteristics and type, a quantity critical to policy analysis, can be estimated more precisely by combining data from traditional and brain-based decision studies.
Analyse & Kritik – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.