Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Challenging policy barriers in sustainable urban design

Challenging policy barriers in sustainable urban design AbstractIn built environment design, codes set minimum health and safety requirements, policies set aspirational targets, and incentives such as green building rating schemes set design standards. These approaches have failed to provide universal well-being and environmental justice (i.e. intra-generational equity), or increases in the natural life-support system that exceed depletion rates (i.e. inter- generational equity). Governments that do not ensure all citizens can obtain basic needs, life quality and resource security fail to meet their basic responsibilities. Two recent documents, one representing sustainable urban policy and principles, the other representing urban biodiversity standards, are examined against the Positive Development Test (whether the development increases the public estate, ecological base and future public options). The discussion suggests that contemporary policies and incentive schemes, as presently conceived, cannot provide the basic physical preconditions for sustainability, let alone address socio-economic inequities. An alternative design-based approach is presented to address the issues the paper identified. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series de Gruyter

Challenging policy barriers in sustainable urban design

Birkeland, Janis
Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series , Volume 40 (40): 16 – Jun 1, 2018
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/challenging-policy-barriers-in-sustainable-urban-design-AehCxjEDCW
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2018 Janis Birkeland, published by Sciendo
ISSN
1732-4254
eISSN
2083-8298
DOI
10.2478/bog-2018-0013
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractIn built environment design, codes set minimum health and safety requirements, policies set aspirational targets, and incentives such as green building rating schemes set design standards. These approaches have failed to provide universal well-being and environmental justice (i.e. intra-generational equity), or increases in the natural life-support system that exceed depletion rates (i.e. inter- generational equity). Governments that do not ensure all citizens can obtain basic needs, life quality and resource security fail to meet their basic responsibilities. Two recent documents, one representing sustainable urban policy and principles, the other representing urban biodiversity standards, are examined against the Positive Development Test (whether the development increases the public estate, ecological base and future public options). The discussion suggests that contemporary policies and incentive schemes, as presently conceived, cannot provide the basic physical preconditions for sustainability, let alone address socio-economic inequities. An alternative design-based approach is presented to address the issues the paper identified.

Journal

Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series – de Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.