Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V. Wulf, M. Rohde, V. Pipek, G. Stevens (2011)
Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCWProceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
S. Strauß (2018)
Dashcam und Datenschutz : Eine kritische Gegenüberstellung von alter und neuer Rechtslage, 31
V. McGeer (2007)
The Regulative Dimension of Folk Psychology
J. Kühling (2019)
Datenschutz im GesundheitswesenMedizinrecht, 37
Carsten Dochow (2019)
Telemedizin und DatenschutzMedizinrecht, 37
(2019)
2019. Roboter in der Pflege, ein Schreckgespenst? InMensch und Computer 2019 - Workshopband
(2005)
Thomas Zerdick in : Eugen Ehmann and Martin Selmayr , Eds . 2018 . DS - GVO . Datenschutz - Grundverordnung : Kommentar Art . 2 II lit . c , Rn . 10 . ( 2 . Auflage )
T. Weichert (2019)
Praktische Anwendungsprobleme im GesundheitsdatenschutzMedizinrecht, 37
(2015)
MEESTAR–ein Modell angewandter Ethik im Bereich assistiver Technologien
David Unbehaun, Konstantin Aal, Felix Carros, R. Wieching, V. Wulf (2019)
Creative and Cognitive Activities in Social Assistive Robots and Older Adults: Results from an Exploratory Field Study with Pepper
L. Damm (2012)
Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from WrongPhilosophical Psychology, 25
Gesa Lindemann (2016)
Social interaction with robots: three questionsAI & SOCIETY, 31
L. Floridi, J. Sanders (2004)
On the Morality of Artificial AgentsMinds and Machines, 14
C. Katzenmeier (2019)
Big Data, E-Health, M-Health, KI und Robotik in der MedizinMedizinrecht, 37
A. Gallagher, D. Nåden, D. Karterud (2016)
Robots in elder careNursing Ethics, 23
Jakub Złotowski, K. Yogeeswaran, C. Bartneck (2017)
Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resourcesInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 100
(2020)
Emotional machines -Perspectives from affective computing and emotional human-machine interaction
V. McGeer (2015)
Mind-making practices: the social infrastructure of self-knowing agency and responsibilityPhilosophical Explorations, 18
Michael Anderson, S. Anderson (2010)
Robot be good.Scientific American, 303 4
T. Smithers (1997)
Autonomy in Robots and Other AgentsBrain and Cognition, 34
M. Eriksson (2005)
State-ofthe-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach
Günther Teubner (2019)
Digitale Rechtssubjekte?: Haftung für das Handeln autonomer Softwareagenten
Felix Carros (2019)
Roboter in der Pflege, ein Schreckgespenst?
L. Connelly (2013)
Grounded theory.Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 22 2
T. Shibata, K. Ohkawa, K. Tanie (1996)
Spontaneous behavior of robots for cooperation. Emotionally intelligent robot systemProceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3
H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, Markus Klann, V. Wulf (2006)
End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm
J. Seibt (2017)
Towards an Ontology of Simulated Social Interaction: Varieties of the “As If” for Robots and Humans
(2018)
Datenschutz-Grundverordnung/BDSG. Kommentar (2
M. Schermann, Holmer Hemsen, Christoph Buchmüller, Till Bitter, H. Krcmar, V. Markl, T. Hoeren (2014)
Big DataWIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 56
W. Louie, D. McColl, G. Nejat (2014)
Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older AdultsAssistive Technology, 26
(2018)
Maschinen mit Moral? Grundfragen der Maschinenethik
Wendell Wallach, C. Allen (2008)
Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong
N. Riether, F. Hegel, B. Wrede, G. Horstmann (2012)
Social facilitation with social robots?2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
V. Wulf, Claudia Müller, V. Pipek, D. Randall, M. Rohde, G. Stevens (2015)
Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies
(2017)
Datenschutzrechtliche Aspekte von Big Data-Analysen im Gesundheitswesen
Katharina Weitz, Dominik Schiller, Ruben Schlagowski, Tobias Huber, E. André (2019)
"Do you trust me?": Increasing User-Trust by Integrating Virtual Agents in Explainable AI Interaction DesignProceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
K. Stubbs, Pamela Hinds, David Wettergreen
Autonomy and Common Ground in Human-robot Interaction
J. Parks (2010)
Lifting the Burden of Women's Care Work: Should Robots Replace the “Human Touch”?Hypatia, 25
Roboter für Assistenzfunktionen: Interaktionsstrategien
(2015)
Datenschutzkonformer Umgang mit Nutzungsprofile: Sind IP-Adressen, Cookies und Fingerprints die entscheidenden Details beim Webtracking? Zeitschrift für Datenschutz
Catrin Misselhorn (2020)
Artificial systems with moral capacities? A research design and its implementation in a geriatric care systemArtif. Intell., 278
Kathrin Janowski, H. Ritschel, Birgit Lugrin, Elsbeth Andre (2018)
Sozial interagierende Roboter in der Pflege
(2013)
Robots as moral agents
A. Pandey, R. Gelin (2018)
A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its KindIEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25
Donald Westlake (2004)
It Loves Me, It Loves me NotNew York Times Book Review
(2020)
Is empathy with robots morally relevant
(2016)
Mensch-Roboter- Interaktion-Eine Taxonomie für alle Anwendungsfälle
G. Riva, E. Riva (2019)
CARESSES: The World's First Culturally Sensitive Robots for Elderly CareCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 22 6
D. Billings, Kristin Schaefer, Jessie Chen, P. Hancock (2012)
Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
(2018)
Robotik und assistive Neurotechnologien in der Pflege– gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen. Berlin: Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag
M. Matarić (2022)
Socially Assistive Robotics: Methods and Implications for the Future of Work and Care
T. Sanders, Tarita Wixon, K. Schafer, Jessie Chen, P. Hancock (2014)
The influence of modality and transparency on trust in human-robot interaction2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA)
C. Breazeal (2002)
Designing sociable robots
(2018)
Datenschutz-Grundverordnung: Kommentar Art. 2 II lit. c, Rn. 10. (2. Auflage). Beck'sche Kurz-Kommentare
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to suggest a framework for categorizing social robots with respect to four dimensions relevant to an ethical, legal and social evaluation. We argue that by categorizing them thusly, we can circumvent problematic evaluations of social robots that are often based on overly broad and abstract considerations. Instead of questioning, for example, whether social robots are ethically good or bad in general, we instead propose that different configurations of (and combinations thereof) the suggested dimensions entail different paradigmatic challenges with respect to ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI). We therefore encourage practitioners to consider these paradigmatic challenges when designing social robots to find creative design solutions.
i-com – de Gruyter
Published: Apr 1, 2020
Keywords: ELSI; meta-analysis; social robotics; ethical design; participative design; privacy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.