Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Back to the Concrete: A Pragmatist Response to Oppression

Back to the Concrete: A Pragmatist Response to Oppression Back to the Concrete: A Pragmatist Response to Oppression Pragmatism is a vital tool for society today, both because it addresses our more pressing social problems and because it advances beyond other available solutions. As a good deal of recent European philosophy has shown, as in the cases of Adorno and Agamben, for example, our social life is mediated by abstractions that oppress us. With its focus on the immediacy of experience, pragmatism enables us to overcome these abstractions and return to concrete life in a liberating way. I argue against Agamben, however, that the return to concrete life amounts to anarchism. I show that it leads to liberalism instead, along the lines laid out by Dewey in Liberalism and Social Action , in which freed individuality is compatible with the exercise of social intelligence and planning. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Affairs de Gruyter

Back to the Concrete: A Pragmatist Response to Oppression

Human Affairs , Volume 19 (1) – Jun 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/back-to-the-concrete-a-pragmatist-response-to-oppression-otEijelkjx

References (13)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the
ISSN
1210-3055
eISSN
1337-401X
DOI
10.2478/v10023-009-0017-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Back to the Concrete: A Pragmatist Response to Oppression Pragmatism is a vital tool for society today, both because it addresses our more pressing social problems and because it advances beyond other available solutions. As a good deal of recent European philosophy has shown, as in the cases of Adorno and Agamben, for example, our social life is mediated by abstractions that oppress us. With its focus on the immediacy of experience, pragmatism enables us to overcome these abstractions and return to concrete life in a liberating way. I argue against Agamben, however, that the return to concrete life amounts to anarchism. I show that it leads to liberalism instead, along the lines laid out by Dewey in Liberalism and Social Action , in which freed individuality is compatible with the exercise of social intelligence and planning.

Journal

Human Affairsde Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.