Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity

Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity AbstractThis paper analyses the concepts of three great Romanian thinkers –theoreticians and philosophers of law – on the relations between law, morals and manners in order to discover, based on their idea filiation in the juridical Romanian culture, the differences of method and contents between them, to identify the practical implication in the field of performing the justice and law-making. Being trained and positioned in the core of the European juridical culture of their time, they reviewed the relations between law and morals, in a rationalist and humanist way, substantiating the need for the law to follow morals, the ethical principles both historically, and practically, the law-making being comprised as well. Thus, they leave room to the expression of human’s basic rights and freedoms in a democratic judicial order, while the rules of law subordinating the morals and manner proved to be widely open to totalitarianism. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Legal Studies de Gruyter

Analysis of the Connections Between Law and Morals, Between Customs and Contemporaneity

Journal of Legal Studies , Volume 25 (39): 12 – Jun 1, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/analysis-of-the-connections-between-law-and-morals-between-customs-and-3pUeP0VXga
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2020 Marțian Iovan, published by Sciendo
eISSN
2392-7054
DOI
10.2478/jles-2020-0004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyses the concepts of three great Romanian thinkers –theoreticians and philosophers of law – on the relations between law, morals and manners in order to discover, based on their idea filiation in the juridical Romanian culture, the differences of method and contents between them, to identify the practical implication in the field of performing the justice and law-making. Being trained and positioned in the core of the European juridical culture of their time, they reviewed the relations between law and morals, in a rationalist and humanist way, substantiating the need for the law to follow morals, the ethical principles both historically, and practically, the law-making being comprised as well. Thus, they leave room to the expression of human’s basic rights and freedoms in a democratic judicial order, while the rules of law subordinating the morals and manner proved to be widely open to totalitarianism.

Journal

Journal of Legal Studiesde Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 2020

There are no references for this article.