Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
DEMONSTRATIO MATHEMATICAVol. XXIVNo 3-41991Mlchal HellerALGEBRAIC FOUNDATIONS OF THE THEORY OF DIFFERENTIAL SPACESIn physics there isgeometricmodelsofanurgentphysicalnon-smooth" generalizationsconcept. Thetheoryofnecessityphenomenaofthetoonbase"sufficientlydifferentiabledifferentialspacessomemanifoldmightprovidephysics with such a possibility. Algebraic foundations of thistheory are discussed.DifferentialSikorski turns out tobealgebraicconceptofaspace"geometricringedspace,inthesenserefinement"anditofofthenaturallygeneralizes the real manifold concept. However, itprovesbemanifolds.inadequatetodealwithcomplexanalyticMostow's theory of differential spaces is a geometricof the theory of structured spaces(essentially,tonaturallymanifoldonegeneralizemusttheconceptsuitablyadaptofversionsheavesgerms of functions on a topological space). It isshowncomplexMostow'stoofthatanalyticconceptofdifferential space.0. Introduct ionThereisawidespreadconvictiongeometry must be constrained to"smooth enough", in practice withdealthatwithspacesspaceswhichdiffeomorphic to a Euclidean space. We havedifferentialthatarelearnedarelocallytolivewith this view, but in fact it is a cumbersome constraint. Theworld around us is far from being "smooth enough", andwould like to haveitsshouldlookardentlydifferentiallyforgeometric"sufficientlyifwemodel,wenon-smooth"350M. Hellergeneralizations of thedifferentiableturns out that for severalyearsamong mathematicians quite amanifoldtherefewaresuchinstance [1] - [9], see also [10] andconcept.incirculationgeneralizationsoriginaltherein), although some of them in a seminalItworksstate(forquotedoftheirdevelopment. In almost all of these works it is preciselytheassumption of the local resemblance to a Euclidean spacethatis rejected, and the structure thus obtained is usually calleda differentialspace.W h e n one starts to applytheseto physical problems, they seemed to work wellmethods([12] -[13]);especially encouraging results have been obtained in t h e fieldof classical space-time singularitiescircumstancesthequestionis([14] - [15]).unavoidable:InWhydosuchthesemethods work? Our hitherto views on differential geometry h a v eturned out to be strongly biased. W h i c h is
Demonstratio Mathematica – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.