Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Response to Jan Narveson: Why Libertarians Are and Are Not Like Turnips

A Response to Jan Narveson: Why Libertarians Are and Are Not Like Turnips Abstract I show how Jan Narveson’s critique fails to unseat my central argument that harm cuts both ways in our assumed idealized conflict situations, such that sometimes the poor harm the rich and sometimes the rich harm the poor. I further show how this supports my overall argument that libertarianism has gone over the brink into the waiting arms of welfare liberals and socialists. I also reject the; other reasons that Narveson provides for not recognizing the welfare rights of distant peoples and future generations which are independent of my argument about harm. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Analyse & Kritik de Gruyter

A Response to Jan Narveson: Why Libertarians Are and Are Not Like Turnips

Analyse & Kritik , Volume 37 – Nov 1, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/a-response-to-jan-narveson-why-libertarians-are-and-are-not-like-AD34pbB0XR

References (1)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the
ISSN
0171-5860
eISSN
2365-9858
DOI
10.1515/auk-2015-1-214
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract I show how Jan Narveson’s critique fails to unseat my central argument that harm cuts both ways in our assumed idealized conflict situations, such that sometimes the poor harm the rich and sometimes the rich harm the poor. I further show how this supports my overall argument that libertarianism has gone over the brink into the waiting arms of welfare liberals and socialists. I also reject the; other reasons that Narveson provides for not recognizing the welfare rights of distant peoples and future generations which are independent of my argument about harm.

Journal

Analyse & Kritikde Gruyter

Published: Nov 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.