Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Deirdre Wilson (2000)
Metarepresentation in linguistic communication
(1988)
The organization of discourse
K. Haberlandt (1982)
Reader Expectations in Text ComprehensionAdvances in psychology, 9
Maite Taboada (2006)
DISCOURSE MARKERS AS SIGNALS (OR NOT) OF RHETORICAL RELATIONSJournal of Pragmatics, 38
(1986)
Relevance: Language and cognition
P. Kolaiti (2005)
Pragmatics and the Phantasm Called Text : a relevance-theoretic approach to Cohesion ∗
(2000)
In defence of monosemy
D. Bolinger (1979)
Meaning and form
J. Fuller (2003)
The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker useJournal of Pragmatics, 35
B. Fraser (1999)
What are discourse markersJournal of Pragmatics, 31
Michiko Takeuchi (1997)
Conceptual and procedural encoding: cause-consequence conjunctive particles in Japanese *Pragmatics and beyond. New series, 58
R. Risselada (1998)
The discourse functions of sane: Latin marker of agreement in description, interaction and concessionJournal of Pragmatics, 30
Siobhan Chapman (2005)
Logic and Conversation
R. Carston (2000)
Explicature and semantics.
Jung-ran Park (2010)
Marking discourse coherence and social-interpersonal meaning
Deirdre Wilson, D. Sperber (1993)
Linguistic form and relevance
E. Eisenberg (1984)
Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communicationCommunication Monographs, 51
T. Matsui (1993)
Bridging reference and the notions of topic' and focus'Lingua, 90
Andreas Jucker (1993)
The discourse marker well: A relevance-theoretical accountJournal of Pragmatics, 19
Maschler (1994)
Discourse Processes Metalanguaging and Discourse Markers in Bilingual Conversation Language inSociety, 35
B. Fraser (1990)
An approach to discourse markersJournal of Pragmatics, 14
A. Bezuidenhout (2004)
Procedural Meaning and the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface
J. Ostman (1982)
The Symbiotic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech.
Andrei Popescu-Belis, S. Zufferey (2003)
What are discourse markers ?
J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon (1995)
Aspectual Coercion and Logical PolysemyJ. Semant., 12
M. Hansen (1997)
Alors and donc in Spoken French: a ReanalysisJournal of Pragmatics, 28
L. Tsitsipis (2009)
The Discursive Construction of Multiple Identities of the Albanian (Arvanitika) Speakers of GreecePragmatics, 19
R. Gibbs, G. Bryant (2008)
Striving for optimal relevance when answering questionsCognition, 106
(2004)
An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn
(1977)
The Unanswered Question: Six Talks at HarvardMusic Educators Journal, 63
C. Iten (1998)
The meaning of although: a Relevance Theoretic account *
Francisco Ramos (1998)
A decade of relevance theoryJournal of Pragmatics, 30
D. Blakemore (1987)
Semantic Constraints on Relevance
L. Schourup (2011)
The discourse marker now: A relevance-theoretic approachFuel and Energy Abstracts
M. Louwerse, Heather Mitchell (2003)
Toward a Taxonomy of a Set of Discourse Markers in Dialog: A Theoretical and Computational Linguistic AccountDiscourse Processes, 35
C. Iten (2005)
Linguistic meaning, truth conditions and relevance : the case of concessives
(1989)
emotionality in oral narratives. Narrative Inquiry
A. Knott, R. Dale (1994)
Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations.Discourse Processes, 18
S. Olmos, A. Ahern (2009)
Contrast and propositional attitude : A relevance theoretic analysis of contrast connectives in Spanish and EnglishLingua, 119
P. Brown, S. Levinson (1978)
Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena
(1991)
Französisch: Partikelforschung
L. Schourup (1982)
Quoting with Go 'Say'American Speech, 57
(1995)
Postface to the second edition of Relevance
Y. Maschler (1994)
Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversationLanguage in Society, 23
(1992)
Understanding utterances
Abstract The present study aims at explaining how the Relevance Theory could be a viable approach to weigh up the main functions of some concessive Pragmatic Operators (henceforth POs) in Jordanian Arabic at the production and interpretation levels. A sample of twenty-two speeches delivered by members of the Jordanian Parliament the 16th was randomly selected for scrutiny. Three POs (namely, laakin, bal and wa) detected in their speeches were analyzed at the token level in light of three elementary RT assumptions about discourse connectives in general, namely connectivity (Fraser 1996), the conceptual-procedural distinction (Blakemore 1987, 1988, 1992, 2002; Wilson and Sperber 1993; Grice 1989), and monosemy (Fretheim 2000; cf. Borderia 2008). The major finding of this study was that concessive POs, as a subset of contrastives, are used to optimize relevance: highlight certain dimensions and/or suppress others of the scenario to the background. However, the point of departure from possibly all previous treatments is that the speakers, as politicians, still used them more strategically because total ambiguity resolution should not be a viable alternative in social settings laden with politics.
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics – de Gruyter
Published: Jul 8, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.