Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context

A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context This paper discusses linguistic vagueness in the context of a semantically restricted domain of legal language. It comments on selected aspects of vagueness found in contemporary English normative legal texts and on terminological problems related to vagueness and indeterminacy both in the legal domain and language in general. The discussion is illustrated with selected corpus examples of vagueness in English legal language and attempts to show problems of the relation between vagueness and ambiguity in the context of legal institutionalised systems. The discussion also evokes theoretical issues which pertain to the relation between legal texts and their contexts, the problem of how linguistic forms acquire their contextual meaning and how linguistic expressions are disambiguated. These issues are further related to the post-Gricean theory of relevance, its inferential model of communication, and the interplay between the linguistic code and inferential processes in (specialised) communication. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Lodz Papers in Pragmatics de Gruyter

A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics , Volume 5 (2) – Jan 1, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/a-note-on-the-linguistic-in-determinacy-in-the-legal-context-DBJtG4z0Hj
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the
ISSN
1895-6106
eISSN
1898-4436
DOI
10.2478/v10016-009-0013-y
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A Note on the Linguistic (In)Determinacy in the Legal Context This paper discusses linguistic vagueness in the context of a semantically restricted domain of legal language. It comments on selected aspects of vagueness found in contemporary English normative legal texts and on terminological problems related to vagueness and indeterminacy both in the legal domain and language in general. The discussion is illustrated with selected corpus examples of vagueness in English legal language and attempts to show problems of the relation between vagueness and ambiguity in the context of legal institutionalised systems. The discussion also evokes theoretical issues which pertain to the relation between legal texts and their contexts, the problem of how linguistic forms acquire their contextual meaning and how linguistic expressions are disambiguated. These issues are further related to the post-Gricean theory of relevance, its inferential model of communication, and the interplay between the linguistic code and inferential processes in (specialised) communication.

Journal

Lodz Papers in Pragmaticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2009

There are no references for this article.