Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Matsumura, M. Reid (1987)
Commutative ring theory: Frontmatter
D is a nonzero ideal of D which is not contained in any proper principal ideal of D
If dD is any nonzero principal ideal of D , then (dD) ⋆ := dD
Ryuki Matsuda, Takasi Sugatani (1995)
Semistar-operations on integral domains, IIMathematics journal of Toyama University, 18
A. Okabe, Ryuki Matsuda (1994)
Semistar-operations on integral domainsMathematics journal of Toyama University, 17
00146 Roma, Italy E-mail address: fontana@mat.uniroma3.it Department of Mathematics Ohio 43055 USA E-mail address: lopera@math.ohio-state
P. Jaffard (1961)
Les systèmes d'idéauxThe Mathematical Gazette, 45
D. Anderson (1978)
Some Remarks on the Ring R(X), 26
L. Kronecker
Grundzüge einer arithmetischen Theorie der algebraische Grössen.Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 1882
L. Kronecker
Grundzüge einer arithmetischen Theorie der algebraischen Grössen. (Abdruck einer Festschrift zu Herrn E. E. Kummers Doctor-Jubiläum, 10. September 1881.).Crelle's Journal, 92
M. Fontana, K. Loper (2001)
A Krull-type theorem for the semistar integral closure of an integral domain
H. Matsumura, M. Reid (1989)
Commutative Ring Theory
J. Marot (1980)
About Nagata ringsmanuscripta mathematica, 33
J. Sally (1972)
A note on integral closure, 36
(2000)
Localizing systems and semistar operations, in "Non Noetherian Commutative Ring Theory
(1961)
Ch. II. Hermann
M. Fontana, P. Jara, E. Santos (2003)
PRÜFER ⋆-MULTIPLICATION DOMAINS AND SEMISTAR OPERATIONSJournal of Algebra and Its Applications, 02
J. Mott, Budh Nashier, M. Zafrullah (1990)
Contents of polynomials and invertibilityCommunications in Algebra, 18
(1997)
Generalized integral closures, in "Factorization in Integral Domains
J. Arnold (1969)
On the Ideal Theory of the Kronecker Function Ring and the Domain D(X)Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 21
M. Fontana, G. Picozza (2004)
SEMISTAR INVERTIBILITY ON INTEGRAL DOMAINSAlgebra Colloquium, 12
JI) ⋆ = (δI 2 ) ⋆ = δ(I ⋆ I ⋆ ) ⋆ = δ(M 2 ) ⋆ = δM
Ryuki Matsuda, I. Sato (1996)
Note on star-operations and semistar-operationsBulletin of The Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University. Series A, Mathematics, 28
M. Fontana, Alan Loper (2003)
Nagata Rings, Kronecker Function Rings, and Related Semistar OperationsCommunications in Algebra, 31
J. Arnold, J. Brewer (1971)
Kronecker function rings and flat $D[X]$-modules, 27
(1984)
Some remarks on cancellation ideals
W. Krull (1937)
Beiträge zur Arithmetik kommutativer IntegritätsbereicheMathematische Zeitschrift, 42
M. Fontana, J. Huckaba (2000)
Localizing systems and semistar operations
(1990)
Divisor Theory
A. Okabe, Ryuki Matsuda (1997)
Kronecker function rings of semistar-operationsTsukuba journal of mathematics, 21
An example of an e.a.b. star operation which is not a.b. (work in progress)
P. Samuel (1971)
Algebraic theory of numbers
(Z) | W ∈ W} . cases J = δI, for some nonzero ideal I of D such that I ⋆ = M and for some nonzero element δ ∈ D (eventually δ = 1). Therefore, J ⋆ = (δI) ⋆ = δI ⋆ = δM
B. Kang (1989)
Prüfer v-multiplication domains and the ring R[X]NvJournal of Algebra, 123
F. Halter-Koch (1998)
Ideal Systems: An Introduction to Multiplicative Ideal Theory
W. Krull (1938)
Beiträge zur Arithmetik kommutativer Integritätsbereiche. IIIaMathematische Zeitschrift, 43
M. Fontana, K. Loper (2019)
Kronecker Function Rings: A General ApproachIdeal Theoretic Methods in Commutative Algebra
F. Ernst (2004)
Multiplicative Ideal Theory
(1961)
Algèbre Commutative
F. Halter-Koch (2003)
Kronecker Function Rings and Generalized Integral ClosuresCommunications in Algebra, 31
Let D be an integral domain with quotient field K . The Nagata ring D ( X ) and the Kronecker function ring Kr( D ) are both subrings of the field of rational functions K ( X ) containing as a subring the ring D X of polynomials in the variable X . Both of these function rings have been extensively studied and generalized. The principal interest in these two extensions of D lies in the reflection of various algebraic and spectral properties of D and Spec( D ) in algebraic and spectral properties of the function rings. Despite the obvious similarities in definitions and properties, these two kinds of domains of rational functions have been classically treated independently, when D is not a Prüfer domain. The purpose of this note is to study two different unified approaches to the Nagata rings and the Kronecker function rings, which yield these rings and their classical generalizations as special cases.
Forum Mathematicum – de Gruyter
Published: Nov 20, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.