Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Progress in historical biogeography

Progress in historical biogeography CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2016, 29,ii Foreword http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SBv29n6_FO A B C D Malte C. Ebach , Juan J. Morrone , Isabel Sanmartín and Tania Escalante Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre (PANGEA), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Museo de Zoología ‘Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico. Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. Grupo de Biogeografía de la Conservación, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. Historical biogeography is the multidisciplinary study of spatial we acknowledge and respect its diversity of approaches, namely, patterns of all biodiversity spanning present and past; it panbiogeography, cladistic biogeography, phylogeography, also spans many different aims and methods (Ebach 2015). parametric biogeography, evolutionary biogeography, and As historical biogeographers, we sought to find an outlet to systematic biogeography, among others. The contributions showcase the different aims and methods of historical in this volume are the first step towards a future series of biogeography. In our view, historical biogeography deserves historical biogeographic special issues and hopefully towards a its own outlet, even its own journal, one that embraces the larger journal that incorporates all methodological and theoretical multidisciplinary nature of the field. As Associate Editors of aspects of historical and paleobiogeography, without restrictions Australian Systematic Botany, we have brought together the first on the number of pages or approaches used. Historical Biogeography Special Issue since the classic Austral If you wish to contribute to the Historical Biogeographic Biogeography (Ladiges et al. 1991) hit the shelves during the Special Issue Series, please submit your contribution by the cladistic biogeography boom of the early 1990s. The methods Australian Systematic Botany submission system: https://mc. of yesteryear have matured and developed due to theoretical manuscriptcentral.com/csiro-sb. and technological breakthroughs, faster computing speeds, and finally, access to far greater resources, such as molecular References phylogenies, electronic distributional data, new geological discoveries (i.e. neotectonics) and geographical information Corral-Rosas V, Morrone JJ (2016) Analysing the assembly of cenocrons in systems. Rather than grind to a halt, historical biogeographic the Mexican transition zone through a time-sliced cladistic biogeographic research has blossomed and a whole new generation of analysis. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), 489–501. doi:10.1071/SB16048 practitioners are building upon the work of earlier studies and de Queiroz A (2016) Jurassic primates, immobile ducks and other oddities: attempts to tackle questions that, after 20 years, still need to be a reply to Heads’ review of The Monkey’s Voyage. Australian Systematic addressed. For example, understanding the historical pathways Botany 29(6), 403–423. doi:10.1071/SB16021 of Southern Hemisphere regions, the validity of these regions, Ebach MC (2015) The multidisciplinary nature of biogeography. Australian and the new geological processes that may affect areas in the Systematic Botany 28(3), 79–80. doi:10.1071/SB15013 short-term. As the Austral Biogeography Special Issue led the Grehan JR (2016) Biogeographic relationships between Macaronesia and the way in the 1990s, here Australian Systematic Botany continues Americas. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), 447–472. that tradition. doi:10.1071/SB16051 In this issue, the first of a series, we show the different aims Ladiges PY, Humphries CJ, Martinelli LW (Eds) (1991). ‘Austral of historical biogeography, namely, the integration of cenocrons Biogeography.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Martínez GA, Arana MD, Oggero AJ, Natale ES (2016) Biogeographical (Corral-Rosas and Morrone 2016), vicariant hypotheses relationships and new regionalisation of high-altitude grasslands and (Ung et al. 2016), historical distributional pathways (Grehan woodlands of the central Pampean Ranges (Argentina), based on 2016; Romano et al. 2016) and biogeographic regionalisation vascular plants and vertebrates. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), (Martínez et al. 2016). Given these different aims, it is not 473–488. doi:10.1071/SB16046 surprising that there are also many different approaches (e.g. Romano GM, Ruiz EV, Lechner BE, Greslebin AG, Morrone JJ (2016) Track vicariance biogeography, panbiogeography and evolutionary analysis of agaricoid fungi of the Patagonian forests. Australian biogeography), and contrasting viewpoints (de Queiroz 2016). Systematic Botany 29(6), 440–446. doi:10.1071/SB16042 We consider historical biogeography – with its differences Ung V, Michaux B, Leschen RAB (2016) A comprehensive vicariant of interpretation and plethora of aims, concepts and methods – model for Southwest Pacific biotas. Australian Systematic Botany to encompass a wide range of opinions and ideas. Given this, 29(6), 424–439. doi:10.1071/SB16032 Journal compilation  CSIRO 2016 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/asb http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Systematic Botany CSIRO Publishing

Progress in historical biogeography

Download PDF
1 page

Loading next page...
 
/lp/csiro-publishing/progress-in-historical-biogeography-zyfPyrAb0H

References (9)

Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by CSIRO Publishing
ISSN
1030-1887
eISSN
1446-4701
DOI
10.1071/SBv29n6_FO
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2016, 29,ii Foreword http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SBv29n6_FO A B C D Malte C. Ebach , Juan J. Morrone , Isabel Sanmartín and Tania Escalante Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre (PANGEA), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Museo de Zoología ‘Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 04510 Mexico City, Mexico. Department of Biodiversity and Conservation, Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. Grupo de Biogeografía de la Conservación, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico. Historical biogeography is the multidisciplinary study of spatial we acknowledge and respect its diversity of approaches, namely, patterns of all biodiversity spanning present and past; it panbiogeography, cladistic biogeography, phylogeography, also spans many different aims and methods (Ebach 2015). parametric biogeography, evolutionary biogeography, and As historical biogeographers, we sought to find an outlet to systematic biogeography, among others. The contributions showcase the different aims and methods of historical in this volume are the first step towards a future series of biogeography. In our view, historical biogeography deserves historical biogeographic special issues and hopefully towards a its own outlet, even its own journal, one that embraces the larger journal that incorporates all methodological and theoretical multidisciplinary nature of the field. As Associate Editors of aspects of historical and paleobiogeography, without restrictions Australian Systematic Botany, we have brought together the first on the number of pages or approaches used. Historical Biogeography Special Issue since the classic Austral If you wish to contribute to the Historical Biogeographic Biogeography (Ladiges et al. 1991) hit the shelves during the Special Issue Series, please submit your contribution by the cladistic biogeography boom of the early 1990s. The methods Australian Systematic Botany submission system: https://mc. of yesteryear have matured and developed due to theoretical manuscriptcentral.com/csiro-sb. and technological breakthroughs, faster computing speeds, and finally, access to far greater resources, such as molecular References phylogenies, electronic distributional data, new geological discoveries (i.e. neotectonics) and geographical information Corral-Rosas V, Morrone JJ (2016) Analysing the assembly of cenocrons in systems. Rather than grind to a halt, historical biogeographic the Mexican transition zone through a time-sliced cladistic biogeographic research has blossomed and a whole new generation of analysis. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), 489–501. doi:10.1071/SB16048 practitioners are building upon the work of earlier studies and de Queiroz A (2016) Jurassic primates, immobile ducks and other oddities: attempts to tackle questions that, after 20 years, still need to be a reply to Heads’ review of The Monkey’s Voyage. Australian Systematic addressed. For example, understanding the historical pathways Botany 29(6), 403–423. doi:10.1071/SB16021 of Southern Hemisphere regions, the validity of these regions, Ebach MC (2015) The multidisciplinary nature of biogeography. Australian and the new geological processes that may affect areas in the Systematic Botany 28(3), 79–80. doi:10.1071/SB15013 short-term. As the Austral Biogeography Special Issue led the Grehan JR (2016) Biogeographic relationships between Macaronesia and the way in the 1990s, here Australian Systematic Botany continues Americas. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), 447–472. that tradition. doi:10.1071/SB16051 In this issue, the first of a series, we show the different aims Ladiges PY, Humphries CJ, Martinelli LW (Eds) (1991). ‘Austral of historical biogeography, namely, the integration of cenocrons Biogeography.’ (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic., Australia) Martínez GA, Arana MD, Oggero AJ, Natale ES (2016) Biogeographical (Corral-Rosas and Morrone 2016), vicariant hypotheses relationships and new regionalisation of high-altitude grasslands and (Ung et al. 2016), historical distributional pathways (Grehan woodlands of the central Pampean Ranges (Argentina), based on 2016; Romano et al. 2016) and biogeographic regionalisation vascular plants and vertebrates. Australian Systematic Botany 29(6), (Martínez et al. 2016). Given these different aims, it is not 473–488. doi:10.1071/SB16046 surprising that there are also many different approaches (e.g. Romano GM, Ruiz EV, Lechner BE, Greslebin AG, Morrone JJ (2016) Track vicariance biogeography, panbiogeography and evolutionary analysis of agaricoid fungi of the Patagonian forests. Australian biogeography), and contrasting viewpoints (de Queiroz 2016). Systematic Botany 29(6), 440–446. doi:10.1071/SB16042 We consider historical biogeography – with its differences Ung V, Michaux B, Leschen RAB (2016) A comprehensive vicariant of interpretation and plethora of aims, concepts and methods – model for Southwest Pacific biotas. Australian Systematic Botany to encompass a wide range of opinions and ideas. Given this, 29(6), 424–439. doi:10.1071/SB16032 Journal compilation  CSIRO 2016 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/asb

Journal

Australian Systematic Botany – CSIRO Publishing

Published: May 11, 2017

There are no references for this article.