Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Kizirian, M. Donnelly (2004)
The criterion of reciprocal monophyly and classification of nested diversity at the species level.Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 32 3
P. Ashlock (1971)
Monophyly and Associated TermsSystematic Biology, 20
R. Sokal, J. Camin (1965)
The Two Taxonomies: Areas of Agreement and ConflictSystematic Biology, 14
S. Kiriakoff (1959)
Phylogenetic Systematics Versus TypologySystematic Biology, 8
B. Hall (1994)
Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology
D. Hull (1990)
Farris on Haeckel, History, and HullSystematic Biology, 39
Michael Schmitt (2013)
From Taxonomy to Phylogenetics Life and Work of Willi Hennig
G. Nelson (1972)
Comments on Hennig's “Phylogenetic Systematics” and its Influence on IchthyologySystematic Biology, 21
N. Platnick (1977)
Paraphyletic and Polyphyletic GroupsSystematic Biology, 26
Nixon KC Carpenter JM
On homology.
E. Mayr (2009)
Cladistic analysis or cladistic classificationJournal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 12
Hennig W
Phylogenetic systematics.
W. Hennig (1950)
Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik
L. Brundin (1968)
Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges : with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the Austral HeptagyiaeThe Geographical Journal, 134
A. Cain, G. Harrison (2009)
AN ANALYSIS OF THE TAXONOMIST'S JUDGMENT OF AFFINITY, 131
K. Queiroz (2007)
Species concepts and species delimitation.Systematic biology, 56 6
G. Nelson (1973)
“Monophyly Again?”—A Reply to P. D. AshlockSystematic Biology, 22
Sha Zhu, J. Degnan, M. Steel (2011)
Clades, clans, and reciprocal monophyly under neutral evolutionary models.Theoretical population biology, 79 4
P. Ashlock (1974)
The Uses of CladisticsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 5
R. Bigelow (1956)
Monophyletic Classification and EvolutionSystematic Biology, 5
O. Rieppel (2009)
Hennig’s enkaptic systemCladistics, 25
J. Avise, J. Shapira, Susan Daniel, C. Aquadro, R. Lansman (1983)
Mitochondrial DNA differentiation during the speciation process in Peromyscus.Molecular biology and evolution, 1 1
W. Bock, W. Hennig, D. Davis, R. Zangerl (1968)
Phylogenetic Systematics, Cladistics and Evolution@@@Phylogenetic Systematics.Evolution, 22
M. Ebach, David Williams (2010)
Aphyly: A Systematic Designation for a Taxonomic ProblemEvolutionary Biology, 37
Q. Wheeler, R. Meier (2000)
Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate
J. Neigel, J. Avise (1986)
PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA UNDER VARIOUS DEMOGRAPHIC MODELS OF SPECIATION
V. Funk, T. Duncan, T. Stuessy (1985)
Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary HistoryBioScience
O. Rieppel (2010)
Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) and the monophyly of lifeJournal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 49
G. Nelson (1971)
Paraphyly and Polyphyly: RedefinitionsSystematic Biology, 20
P. Darlington (1970)
A Practical Criticism of Hennig-Brundin “Phylogentic Systematics” and Antarctic BiogeographySystematic Biology, 19
Haeckel E
The gastraea-theory, the phylogenetic classification of the animal kingdom, and the homology of the germ-lamellae.
Leandro Assis, O. Rieppel (2011)
Are monophyly and synapomorphy the same or different? Revisiting the role of morphology in phylogeneticsCladistics, 27
P. Ashlock (1979)
An Evolutionary Systematist's View of ClassificationSystematic Biology, 28
G. Nelson (1994)
3 – HOMOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS
W. Hennig (1975)
Cladistic Analysis or Cladistic Classification A Reply to Ernst MayrSystematic Biology, 24
J. Farris (1990)
Haeckel, History, and HullSystematic Biology, 39
Ernst Haeckel (1866)
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenz-Theorie. Band 1: Allgemeine Anatomie. Band 2: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte
A. Urbanek (1998)
Oligophyly and evolutionary parallelism: A case study of Silurian graptolitesActa Palaeontologica Polonica, 43
Rieppel O
Species monophyly.
G. Nelson (1969)
The Problem of Historical BiogeographySystematic Biology, 18
E. Mayr (1965)
Numerical Phenetics and Taxonomic TheorySystematic Biology, 14
Ernst Haeckel
Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 1
J. Slater, J. Polhemus (1990)
Obituary: Peter D. Ashlock 1929-1989Journal of The New York Entomological Society, 98
Farris JS
Processed science.
E. Mayr (1969)
Principles of systematic zoology
Leandro Assis (2014)
Species and tokogenetic homologies: 10 sutrasCladistics, 30
T. Borgmeier (1957)
Basic Questions of SystematicsSystematic Biology, 6
L. Brundin (1966)
Transantarctic relationships and their significance
S. Richter, R. Meier (1994)
The development of phylogenetic concepts in Hennig's early theoretical publications (1947-1966)Systematic Biology, 43
Ashlock PD
Monophyly again.
K. Nixon, Q. Wheeler (1990)
AN AMPLIFICATION OF THE PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES CONCEPTCladistics, 6
E. Haeckel (1874)
Memoirs: The Gastraea-Theory, the Phylogenetic Classification of the Animal Kingdom and the Homology of the Germ-LamellæJournal of Cell Science
J. Farris (1974)
Formal Definitions of Parapliyly and PolyphylySystematic Biology, 23
W. Bock (1973)
Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary ClassificationSystematic Biology, 22
P. Darlington (1972)
What is CladismSystematic Biology, 21
Maximiliano Garcia, Alicia Miravalles, P. Leonardi (2007)
Formación de pelos en el alga agarófita gracilaria chilensis(Gracilariales, Rhodophyta)Darwiniana, 45
R. Sattler (1964)
Methodological Problems in TaxonomySystematic Biology, 13
D. Colless (1967)
The Phylogenetic FallacySystematic Biology, 16
I. Henderson, W. Henderson, J. Kenneth (1930)
A Dictionary of Scientific TermsThe Indian Medical Gazette, 65
Hennig W
Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten.
R. Burton, S. Karlin, E. Nevo (1986)
Evolutionary Processes and Theory
W. Bock (1968)
PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS, CLADISTICS AND EVOLUTIONEvolution, 22
P. Ashlock (1981)
Monophyly: Its Meaning and Importance
F. Austerlitz, Olivier David, B. Schaeffer, K. Bleakley, Madalina Olteanu, R. Leblois, M. Veuille, C. Larédo (2009)
DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methodsBMC Bioinformatics, 10
The various existing definitions of monophyly have resulted in confusion within the systematics community. The divergence in terminology started with the work of Willi Hennig who attempted to introduce a precise definition of phylogenetic relationship in 1950, a term that he had synonymised with monophyly by 1953, thereby creating a new definition. In 1965, Hennig introduced paraphyly to distinguish his version of monophyly from groups based on symplesiomorphies or stem groups. In attempting to resolve the confusion, Ashlock synonymised Hennigs monophyly as holophyly, resulting in another new term. Ashlock, Mayr and others defended Haeckels original use of monophyly, by including holophyly and paraphyly. The result was an unresolved 21-year debate on monophyly and its various uses. A review of the history of monophyly and the origins of its various definitions has resulted in two new terms to distinguish the different versions of monophyly currently in use: diamonophyly, which group definitions based a notion of ancestor-descendant relationships, and synmonophyly, which groups definition based on kinship relationships. The terms reciprocal monophyly and oligophyly are discussed as being diamonophyletic.
Australian Systematic Botany – CSIRO Publishing
Published: Dec 20, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.