Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Contact tracing for sexually transmitted infections in New South Wales, Australia

Contact tracing for sexually transmitted infections in New South Wales, Australia Background: Contact tracing is an important strategy in the control of sexually transmitted infections (STI) because it encourages individuals who may be unaware they have been exposed to an infection to be tested and treated. The aim of this study was to review STI contact tracing procedures in NSW by sexual health clinics (SHC), public health units (PHU) and general practitioners (GP). Methods: A questionnaire study carried out in 2004–2005 of SHC, PHU and a random sample of GP in NSW. SHC and PHU participated in structured interviews and GP completed questionnaires at educational workshops or through a mail-out. Interviews and questionnaires addressed current contact tracing practice and methods of improving the service. Results: All 35 SHC, 6/18 (33%) PHU and 172/212 (81%) of the GP who responded to the survey undertook contact tracing for STI. Chlamydia was the STI most commonly traced by SHC (34/35, 97%) and GP (165/172, 96%). HIV was the STI most commonly traced by PHU (5/6, 83%). Only 23/172 (13%) GP were familiar with the ‘Australasian contact tracing manual’. The commonest barriers to tracing for SHC and GP included patient reluctance (SHC 60%, GP 71%), and the lack of contact details for partners (SHC 46%, GP 60%). GP identified the availability of information for patients (82%) and more training (55%) as necessary resources for optimal contact tracing. Conclusions: SHC and GP frequently undertook contact tracing for some STI; PHU do so less frequently. Barriers to contact tracing are similar for all health-care providers. For GP, there is a need for increased training and the development of written policies and agreed pathways for referral. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Sexual Health CSIRO Publishing

Contact tracing for sexually transmitted infections in New South Wales, Australia

Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/csiro-publishing/contact-tracing-for-sexually-transmitted-infections-in-new-south-wales-6ua6lBKxs1

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Copyright
CSIRO
ISSN
1448-5028
eISSN
1449-8987
DOI
10.1071/SH06019
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Background: Contact tracing is an important strategy in the control of sexually transmitted infections (STI) because it encourages individuals who may be unaware they have been exposed to an infection to be tested and treated. The aim of this study was to review STI contact tracing procedures in NSW by sexual health clinics (SHC), public health units (PHU) and general practitioners (GP). Methods: A questionnaire study carried out in 2004–2005 of SHC, PHU and a random sample of GP in NSW. SHC and PHU participated in structured interviews and GP completed questionnaires at educational workshops or through a mail-out. Interviews and questionnaires addressed current contact tracing practice and methods of improving the service. Results: All 35 SHC, 6/18 (33%) PHU and 172/212 (81%) of the GP who responded to the survey undertook contact tracing for STI. Chlamydia was the STI most commonly traced by SHC (34/35, 97%) and GP (165/172, 96%). HIV was the STI most commonly traced by PHU (5/6, 83%). Only 23/172 (13%) GP were familiar with the ‘Australasian contact tracing manual’. The commonest barriers to tracing for SHC and GP included patient reluctance (SHC 60%, GP 71%), and the lack of contact details for partners (SHC 46%, GP 60%). GP identified the availability of information for patients (82%) and more training (55%) as necessary resources for optimal contact tracing. Conclusions: SHC and GP frequently undertook contact tracing for some STI; PHU do so less frequently. Barriers to contact tracing are similar for all health-care providers. For GP, there is a need for increased training and the development of written policies and agreed pathways for referral.

Journal

Sexual Health – CSIRO Publishing

Published: Feb 26, 2007

References

  • Contact tracing for sexually transmissible diseases in general-practice in Victoria, Australia.
    Keogh L
  • Partner notification in the United States: an evidence-based review.
    Macke BA
  • The epidemiology of notified genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Victoria, Australia: a survey of diagnosing providers.
    Thompson SC
  • Quality of sexually transmitted infection clinical management and contact tracing outcomes in a remote area of high sexually transmitted infection endemicity.
    Mak DB
  • Evaluation of sexual health services within Australia and New Zealand.
    Marks C
  • The management of sexually transmitted infections by Australian general practitioners.
    Johnston VJ
  • A survey of contact tracing practice for sexually transmitted diseases in GUM clinics in England and Wales.
    Stokes T
  • An evaluation of partner notification for HIV infection in genitourinary medicine clinics in England.
    Fenton KA
  • Results of a randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina.
    Landis SE
  • A survey of patients with Chlamydia trachomatis infection: sexual behaviour and perceptions about contact tracing.
    Tyden T
  • Efficacy of partner notification for HIV infection.
    Giesecke J
  • Sexual health problems managed in Australian general practice – a National cross-sectional survey.
    Freedman E
  • Developing national outcome standards for the management of gonorrhoea and genital chlamydia in genitourinary medicine clinics.
    Low N