Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparing data subsets and transformations for reproducing an expert-based vegetation classification of an Australian tropical savanna

Comparing data subsets and transformations for reproducing an expert-based vegetation... Mapping vegetation communities requires considerable investment in field data collection, analysis and interpretation. The methods for data collection and analysis can significantly affect field time and the accuracy of the classifications. We test the ability of field data subsets and data pre-treatments to reproduce an intuitively derived vegetation classification within the Australian tropical savanna biome. The data subsets include all strata, upper strata, ground strata, and tree basal area. A range of multivariate techniques were used to describe patterns in the datasets as they related to the a priori vegetation classification. We tested the degree of floristic correlation among the data subsets and the extent to which several data transformations (square root, fourth root, presence or absence) improved the level of agreement between the numerically and the intuitively derived mapping units. Our results implied high redundancy in sampling both basal area and upper strata species cover, and the ground stratum was poorly correlated with the upper stratum. Across all statistical tests, the groups derived from analysis of square root-transformed upper stratum cover data were closely aligned with the expert classification. We propose that a numerical approach using an optimal dataset will produce a meaningful classification for vegetation mapping in poorly known Australian tropical savanna. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Australian Journal of Botany CSIRO Publishing

Comparing data subsets and transformations for reproducing an expert-based vegetation classification of an Australian tropical savanna

Loading next page...
 
/lp/csiro-publishing/comparing-data-subsets-and-transformations-for-reproducing-an-expert-L02e43uwut

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by CSIRO Publishing
ISSN
0067-1924
eISSN
1444-9862
DOI
10.1071/BT20164
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Mapping vegetation communities requires considerable investment in field data collection, analysis and interpretation. The methods for data collection and analysis can significantly affect field time and the accuracy of the classifications. We test the ability of field data subsets and data pre-treatments to reproduce an intuitively derived vegetation classification within the Australian tropical savanna biome. The data subsets include all strata, upper strata, ground strata, and tree basal area. A range of multivariate techniques were used to describe patterns in the datasets as they related to the a priori vegetation classification. We tested the degree of floristic correlation among the data subsets and the extent to which several data transformations (square root, fourth root, presence or absence) improved the level of agreement between the numerically and the intuitively derived mapping units. Our results implied high redundancy in sampling both basal area and upper strata species cover, and the ground stratum was poorly correlated with the upper stratum. Across all statistical tests, the groups derived from analysis of square root-transformed upper stratum cover data were closely aligned with the expert classification. We propose that a numerical approach using an optimal dataset will produce a meaningful classification for vegetation mapping in poorly known Australian tropical savanna.

Journal

Australian Journal of BotanyCSIRO Publishing

Published: Aug 23, 2021

There are no references for this article.