Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
ARTICLES The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Division of Korea: A Comparative Approach William Stueck University of Georgia The fundamental political development in Korea following World War II was its division into two ideologically hostile regimes, each deter- mined to destroy the other. Given the strategic location of the penin- sula a n d the ideological conflict between the superpowers that emerged after the war, Korea's division might seem inevitable, at least from the p o i n t of joint Soviet-American occupation after Japan's s u r r e n d e r in 1945. The same might be said of Austria in the aftermath of its occupa- tion b y Allied forces d u r i n g the previous spring; yet b y the e n d of the year a united indigenous government h a d emerged in that country. Ten years later, foreign forces left Austria as a united neutral nation. The story of Austria's relatively h a p p y evolution after World War 11 cries out for comparison w i t h the depressing tale of Korea's descent into w a r a n d long-term division. This essay
Journal of American-East Asian Relations – Brill
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.